Curation on here is done manually by a team of curators. They go through the posts, determine what posts offer what value and how much of such is offered and upvote accordingly.
It's great because it pushes the users to do and give more to get better upvotes.
when i first started using musing.io i used to think that the upvotes are done by a bot but recently i discovered that there are curators on ground that manually check every posts and determine which posts get upvotes or not,i love the fact that it is done that way because it will make this wonderful platform to be more transparent
I believe that Musing.io does manual curation. The answers and questions are rewarded based on their relevance, quality, detail, language, etc. These are all criteria that the curators have to look for in an answer before awarding any upvotes.
This basically means that both questions and answers have to be read by the curators before any curation can be done.
Musing's curators take the time to read every post and upvote manually. They base the upvote on the post's quality. The post should be well structured and have good grammar and punctuation.
The curation is done manually. This ensures more credibility. Users get to rewarded based on the relevance of their answers to the question(s) asked.
More people will be needed in the future, or so I think. More and more people are joining Musing everyday. Soon enough, the work will become tiresome for just few persons to do.
I will be ready to offer my service when that time comes.
Curation on here is done manually by a team of curators. They go through the posts, determine what posts offer what value and how much of such is offered and upvote accordingly.
It's great because it pushes the users to do and give more to get better upvotes.
when i first started using musing.io i used to think that the upvotes are done by a bot but recently i discovered that there are curators on ground that manually check every posts and determine which posts get upvotes or not,i love the fact that it is done that way because it will make this wonderful platform to be more transparent
I believe that Musing.io does manual curation. The answers and questions are rewarded based on their relevance, quality, detail, language, etc. These are all criteria that the curators have to look for in an answer before awarding any upvotes.
This basically means that both questions and answers have to be read by the curators before any curation can be done.
Musing's curators take the time to read every post and upvote manually. They base the upvote on the post's quality. The post should be well structured and have good grammar and punctuation.
join the discord server and find out :p
The curation is done manually. This ensures more credibility. Users get to rewarded based on the relevance of their answers to the question(s) asked.
More people will be needed in the future, or so I think. More and more people are joining Musing everyday. Soon enough, the work will become tiresome for just few persons to do.
I will be ready to offer my service when that time comes.