Yesterday I wrote about why I don't steal games and today I'll focus on the media that got the entire piracy online thinger started: The sharing of music without permission.
source
For me, and a vast majority of people alive at the time, it all began with Napster. It was incredibly easy to get a hold of just about any song you wanted without paying for it. Of course you had to be careful because sometimes people would disguise bogus virus files as the song you were looking for. Also, the music industry infiltrated these stocks also by creating a file with the same name that would loop 5 seconds of the song you were looking for and do so for the same length of time as the actual song so you wouldn't be able to tell them apart until you had already downloaded it. There was a lot of trial and error involved, but at the time it was still preferable to what the alternative was.
source
worst album ever
In the mid 90's the price of CD's was reaching absurd levels, around $25 or so per one. This was becoming particularly egregious because of the fact that a few people now had disk-burners and we were very aware of the fact that a blank disk costs almost nothing. It was becoming evident the markup on these things was immense.
Rather than try to adapt or forgo any of their profits in a compromise, the record industry decided to sue everyone from the owners of Napster, Bearshare, and Limewire all the way to down to somoene's grandma who didn't even know what she was downloading. It would later occur to me how ironic it was that two of the spokespeople for this movie were Dr. Dre (who uses other people's music for everything he makes) and Lars Ulrich, who would years later be largely responsible for one of the biggest dupings of their fanbase of all time with the release of St Anger, an album that all members of Metallica would later admit they "knew was terrible but released it anyway."
source
devious money-making tactics are ok, as long as it doesn't happen to you! Right Lars?
So why did I stop downloading entire albums? I think for the same reason almost everyone else did. It isn't necessary to have a massive music library anymore. If you really want to hear a song you can legally go to Youtube and search for almost anything (except Prince videos for some reason - finding Prince videos is almost impossible.) If you need music on the go a very inexpensive music service like Spotify (which I love) is like $2 a month although I am told the price varies by region.
source
Maybe it is different for people in the west but I am not really subjected to new music in any way. I don't know what new music sounds like and the only way I can find that out is to have it kind of displayed for me and Spotify is excellent for that. Of course they are likely incorporating their preferred brands (so to speak) into their choices the same way Youtube features certain content creators, but I guess i don't care. Spotify learns what you like after a while plus the fact that someone can be in the car with me and mention someone completely off the wall like "do you have Off The Wall by Michael Jackson" and the answer is normally "yes, yes i do."
The industry went through a period of intense greed and refused to budge on it. They fought so long trying to discourage the use of digital music in a digital age. CD's were pushed on us well beyond their useful time. The people refused to buckle though and more covert methods of downloading were made such as torrents and this is where the recording industry didn't really have much choice but to give up because you can't win that battle.
Anyway, i think the tl;dr of this can be summarized in this statement. It is easier to pay for it now than to steal it and the cost of the service is so low and this is the reason i stopped stealing music ... and Lars Ulrich is annoying.
I am on the same page. I use google play and youtube for my entertainment purposes.
Even software has gone the way of subsciption services these days (adobe creative cloud etc) which I have mixed feelings about. I like that you get to stay up to date with the latest version all inclusively, but it sucks if you fall on hard times but still need your software. You don't usually get a fallback version; you simply can't use it!
I think we are in a transitional period though, and thinks are being worked out. It will be interesting to see how the digital world will be in 10 years.
for stuff like you are describing I tend to use the open source equivalent and they are perfectly adequate as a backup. However, I don't use a great deal of that stuff but have you considered GIMP as a backup for PS?
I do use nowdays streaming as well. Sure it is convienient. But using legal (cheap) services took away one major advantage from the torrent-music epocha. Guess what?
That sweet taste of doing something ilegal !
The feeling when you are smart enough to get something for free, for what someby cash out tons of $$$.
Posted using Partiko Android
Listening to or even obtaining non-free/label music legally is now easier than ever with online-platforms and services like YouTube and Deezer where open-source software can download the source using their published API (even if it's against their TOS).
I don't see the need to actually pirate, illegally copy music, torrent, or ripping music off of disks anymore.
Of-course if you like a particular song you're listening to you should always consider supporting the artist regardless, regardless if you can get it for free.
very nicely put. I remember a story about how Trent Reznor (spelling?) got tired of his label and just decided to release his music online for free and put a "donate" button there. he actually made more money by doing it this way since the record label routinely takes 80% of the profits. I am making up these stats but the story is true.
According to this study with non-existent piracy economy is worse off:
Source
Good on you. I published official songs on Spotify too. We have a tag called #boombox now where my alternate profiles resteem songs for free.
It's true that many hackers are making punch-bombs and making music files. This file appears to be a music file already. In case anyone clicking on this file will enter the virus into the victim's device so we should take care
Maybe we all need to stop before the incentive to make new music is gone?
If we use apps that are meant for music or any other stuff, it would be helpful for the creators.
Posted using Partiko Android
actually apps like Spotify and the sort pay royalties to the creators. I have no idea how much, but it is completely legal and there are contracts etc.
That was nice to read, thanks for sharing! 🙏
I'm also really curious about what the digital world will bring the next few years, especially to the music industry.
Have you got some information about music and blockchain? If yes whatbdo you think about it? Will it be the future?
Cause nowadays there are alot of intermediaries between the artists and the listeners. Through blockchain I thnk they could be eliminated.
Posted using Partiko Android