After looking at what kinds of comments have been upvoted most heavily in the past, I have developed this tip sheet to help you and I.
HERE ARE THE TIPS BELOW
- Spot trending posts and strike early. Yes, you're still rewarded for recognizing sensible posts early. If a post is probably going to urge some votes and a good-sized payout, then the highest comments ought to get upvoted and paid well additionally. the primary comment or 2 have the most effective probability to say this reward, tho' somebody might return on later and write an excellent higher reply. If you create a decent reply post early and have intercourse systematically, you won’t get rewarded whenever, however on the average you ought to score additional hits than misses.
The following screenshot shows an example reply by @hiroyamagishi on one of @splendorhub's posts that shows you the first good reply can pick up some votes. It also follows some of the other tips in this article.
Praise the post, if it’s worth it. Steemit may be a positive place. we have a tendency to could disagree , however the overwhelming majority of the comments that are upvoted within the past square measure replies that tell the initial poster that he or she wrote an honest article. Some voters won't take the time to put in writing their own comments, particularly if they essentially say a similar issue (“nice post”). however if they see that you simply have written one thing like this already, there's a far larger probability they'll merely upvote your comment.
something like this image I screenshot from @sirlahmjr's blog, in the image above, you can see that the whole comment on the post got upvoted.Highlight and Respond. In your reply comment, you ought to write over merely “Nice post.” Use your comment to focus on one thing the author wrote or answer the points that he/she created. Was there one thing above all you likeable concerning it? Did you agree or trouble the points this author made? Why? Be honest and provides your opinion, pro or con. you'll disagree if you would like, as long as you're respectful. completely different views ar healthy.
being a newbie, using markdowns(higlighting, quoting, centralizing, and others) will be a challenge at first but, as time goes on, you'll get to learn and master it. You'll see an higlighted and replied quote in the image above.Add helpful data, correct one thing, or raise a matter. Did the author tell one thing? skip a part of the story? does one understand something regarding the subject that wasn't lined within the post? perhaps it absolutely was a decent post otherwise, and you'll be able to tell them such, however illustrate one thing else the first author failed to embody or failed to state properly. This works nice in technical postings, by the way, that have resulted within the most prolific reply comment chains up to now on Steemit. or else, if you thought the author simply failed to perceive the topic well and created a multitude of it, you'll be able to be honest regarding this, additionally. Again, be respectful.
For example : Your post was very thoughtful. However, I think readers would appreciate knowing that there is a formula for this, which is…
Using a format like that of below, you'll get the attention of the author of the post and he/she may give you an upvote on your comment.
- Aim for a lengthy paragraph. Sometimes, one sentence is enough, however there’s a decent likelihood somebody can return on and augment the spoken language a lot meaningfully than you've got (and then their comment can get the upvotes). One sentence doesn't show abundant effort. On the opposite hand, if you write an excessive amount of, the majority won’t browse it (TL;DR), unless you actually have one thing helpful to feature that takes that abundant house to clarify. From what we've seen on extremely upvoted reply comments thus far on Steemit, 2-5 sentences could be a sensible target length. Some sensible ones may be shorter or longer, however this appears to be a decent "ballpark estimate" supported the record of past comments.
