Yup. The burden of proof has to be on the person making the assertion. I'm open to the possibility that claims made about the Rothchild's wealth are true, but I have not yet seen actual proof.
Trying to prove a negative (like there is no conspiracy) is like trying to prove the Flying Spaghetti Monster doesn't exist.
TDV is right about a lot of things. He may be right about the Rothchilds, but without proof, the most we have on the matter is suspicion.
I have been very interested about the Rothschilds for a long time and read everything I can about them, granted much of what is said may be pure speculation, but one thing is true they have been immensely rich for centuries, how rich nobody knows.
And they are closely related to all financial movements, so anything said about what they are doing money-wise should be watched with interest.