"existing or historical revenues" --> Do you have a reference?
"We're the most real token out there, website and all!" --> I could name 20 tokens that have/had a better appearance than you (EOS, Tezos, Nimiq, actually, all of them), with actual facts and not just blabla on their websites, AND actual whitepapers explaining the technology, combined with a serious team multiple times larger than yours (basically you, one dev, and someone who already left, who you still include in your slides).
"BTW, Veritaseum is currently the number 2 asset in the industry in market cap, the best performing token in the history of the industry" --> Last time I checked Veritaseum was on #18 on coinmarketcap.com - where did you read "number 2"? The best performing token in history is EÒS. Why would you lie so blatantly?
"Any IP protections? Patents filed?" --> You're also not providing any proof that you filed patents. Instead you present your patents like this: "COOL, TECHNICAL SOUNDING STUFF ON HOW TO DO AMAZING THINGS WITH THE BLOCKCHAIN THAT YOU'VE NEVER HEARD OF BEFORE GOES HERE" --> So what else can people write about? Patents that are already filed are not secret anymore. Can you publish them now? If not, why not?
well you just proven yourself to be a idiot,
Reggie was writing that time the 2nd ranking Assets ....!! ... while you didnt even seem to understand the difference between a coin and a asset