Yes, sometimes a photo is just enough. I guess we will look often at the big picture and overall quality of the poster and involve others in the final decision.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Yes, sometimes a photo is just enough. I guess we will look often at the big picture and overall quality of the poster and involve others in the final decision.
The best thing about art like photography is you let the viewers think of what's inside your head and feels what inside your heart by looking at your piece of work called "masterpiece" and even a dot in a white background can be more meaningful than thousand words. If you'll the explain the details and "whys" of the art, then what's the sense of doing it? I think you guys should sit on this and think it thoroughly because it seems something is missing with your discussions on your tables. Maybe you should consult an artist and ask why a painting most of the time is just a painting and the name or signature of the artist on it.
I will repeat, that this was my personal opinion. I don't have an eye for art yet i smell shitposts and farmers miles away, usually. We have a team that solves these cases, where one man's opinion is not enough, so we don't do injustice to good authors.
Thanks for the feedback, guys!
Absolutely right @gvincentjosephm, that can not be better expressed. I agree with that 100%!
It would be nice if there were curators who have an overview of the art market or at least some expertise in the field of photo art. It's not that easy to judge the works anyway.