I agree with your comment. There are many examples of bias and misinformation in history, with organised religion being a prime example of this.
In today’s overly connected landscape there are plenty of sources of unbiased information that discuss current events, there’s even a few accounts on Steemit that strive to provide such information.
This post, that is overloaded with paid votes which has drawn an absurd amount of funds from the limited reward pool, is a disappointment to say the least.
Posted using Partiko iOS
It gives us some hope that we have people in the alternative media that are willing to challenge the mostly biased mainstream stories. Steem is perfect for the alternative media considering we are censorship resistance.
History can not be so easily challenged because of the monopoly of information at the time.
The arguments in this post are quite weak and should be fleshed out further. As it stands, I feel the arguments are simply a reaction to mainstream media.
I am also disappointed that most others commenting are simply agreeing with very little demonstration of critical thought.
This “author” writes to a schedule. He simply pumps out content rather than writing for the sheer enjoyment of it.
And most of his followers are spouting positive responses in the hopes of an upvote. The author encourages people to upvote one another which also encourages only positive comments rather than real debate.
It’s refreshing to see your honest comments here. Keep it up. :)
Posted using Partiko iOS