Indeed there's many excuses for why everyone said no and I like that people have voted since then, however, I still think curation ought to be organic, which vote trading, vote begging and vote selling and buying is indifferent to and I think that's probably why nobody who has real interest in the community bothers too much to come and reward people on these bought for trending whore posts, even though, I admit, some of the responses are valuable and certainly not simply parroting the post, at least not completely, like others, not that rephrasing the post isn't itself valuable, but regardless, the bought for attention makes for the bought for responses and then the pleading for how others should act is hypocritical since he spends the most vp on himself but wants everyone to upvote each other. If everyone upvoted each other like he does, everyone would upvote for themselves, it's the embarrassing position of "do as I say not as I do". If he would spend all that money he does on promotion to power up and he was rewarding people organically he would have built a real audience, would have not experienced this complete absence of veteran dolphins, orcas and whales in response to his posts and would not be begging or pleading with people on how to interact. He thinks he deserves that "50 votes per each other" in his posts responses but he hasn't worked one minute in that direction by actually exemplifying that, thats why instead of deserving such an audience, he has to work with this audience, who he has to beg, plead with, or dangle carrots in front of them by his bought for votes.

Posted using Partiko Android