no? but haaretz is barely a jewish source anyways. You should also make the distinction. It’s like saying Jewish democrats represent republican democrats. So yah, it is kinda anti semetic. I still have an upvote, but “haaretz” certainly does not represent “Israel” either. Self haters never did!
I did however point out that there are contentious divides between Orthodox Jews and Reformed or Atheist Jews. I also pointed out that most of the Bolsheviks/Communists were either reformed or atheist Jews.
I'm not, strictly, not, going to devote 3 paragraphs to the history of divisions within Jewry every single time I write anything which involves Jews. I can go into details about those divisions, I'm just not going to devote half the written piece to going into detail every time Jews are mentioned. Would you demand a 3-5 paragraph section detailing the history of Protestants Vs Catholics in every article, message or missive which contains the word "irish" ?
At some point I ought to be able to say "The Irish were involved in Q", without it requiring a 3 paragraph disclaimer informing people not to confuse North Irish Loyalists, with Irish Catholics. Unless that, specifically that, is the actual topic of discussion.
Well I think my critique is fair; Haaretz is a commy socialist leftist plagued CNN. I think the issue is that world wide Jewry is a tiny percent of the world population; so it's hard for regular people to discern that there are factions within a tiny minority and certainly socialists exist, but they are NOT the majority. I am making it clear to NOT strike a broad paint brush which HAARETZ could certainly appear to do (and you pointing them out)