I am sure Ross has violated the laws of many countries, but none of those laws are just. I have yet to see the video*, and appreciate the exposition you provide, but insofar as Ross is guilty only of refusing to allow others to impose their authority over sovereign people to conduct commerce as they see fit I will understand he is only 'guilty' of being naturally born a man with full authority over himself.

Thanks!

Edit: *I am deeply digging into analysis of the flurry of executive orders and the far reaching implications of some of the more politically consequenctial presently.