You're right. As a natural born human, I am unconvinced that some other humans have any right to demand authority over me, or anyone else, and that underlies my primary objection to Ross's conviction. I reckon the fundamental criminality inherent to those making such unjust demands of authority spilled over into blatant theft by fraud of evidence in Ross's case, and a vast array of further insults added to the cruel injury he personally - but all humanity - suffer as a result of such insuperable claims.

But, not only didn't he commit any crimes by refusing to respect criminals claiming authority to determine what commerce free, sovereign, natural born people can undertake, the relative claims of harm he was even accused of pale in comparison to myriad far more deadly frauds the pharmaceutical, insurance, and medical corporations get away with every day, exactly as you point out.

Thanks!