Sort:  

Quite the reverse, I understand that these things are very useful. That's why it's so important to make this moral point. As a society, we don't want to make one person's life miserable because of the choices and actions of people who happen to share their skin color or gender. Even where that is to our benefit. We make the moral choice to give up the benefits of stereotyping because we consider the costs to be unacceptable, largely because they disproportionately fall on completely innocent people.

I don't think you know who you're dealing with here. You used the word "we" constantly. There is no we. When you use the word "we" in this manner, you're implying you're the moral authority or father figure of some imaginary collective and everyone else needs to conform to your behavior. There is no we and there is no collective.

This is a common leftist trick to try and indoctrinate people into Marxism. This stuff might work against feeble minded children, but I'm not some guy off the movie idiocracy you can beat with such primitive tricks.

Let's talk about the reason you use this propaganda. You have the last name Katz, an Ashkenazi Jewish name. Jews have evolved to use collectivism as a group evolutionary strategy. It's a well documented characteristic:

http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Jewish_group_evolutionary_strategy

The other fact is that you push Marxist collectivism because you see homogeneous civilizations as a threat to your minority demographic. Your motivations are entirely selfish. You're literally trying to brainwash people to benefit yourself. None of it is real. It's all fake, self serving propaganda.

The "we" you speak of is actually "you" and your interests, not mine or anyone else's. So while you are masquerading as some type of white knight out to help all of humanity, your behavior is entirely selfish in nature.