I read everything there long ago. There's also a comment where he clearly says he's accepting blame. These things depend on context though. Context that isn't included here. You're making sure to leave some parts out? That's possible. Purely speculation.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
[-]ned (69) · 2 days ago
I began mentioning it much more strongly prior to the hardfork when some Witnesses began admitting they hadn’t read the release notes and some top 20 Witnesses only began testing two days prior to the proposed HF. Ask Lukestokes or Reggaemuffin who began prompting Witnesses for their published standards and when.
Yup, I read that. And you left out the other part.
Implying I am leaving out something but not saying what? You make a lot of suppositions but let's leave it at that, I am not really trying to disprove you, I guess this would be a matter of each person's perspective and in something like this I prefer facts, but to each his own.
It's best to include links so people reading this can see the entire conversation. That's all. That shouldn't be a big deal.
Ok, fair point but I really didn't include links because the whole conversation was available in that red link that Steemit placed on the top of everyone's blog, with the updates on the RC issue, which fortunately is no longer there.