The fact that the mind controls perception, as it happens, I will describe in following articles, Yes, many processes occur at an unconscious and automatic level, but is also part of consciousness and it is possible to learn to manage.
Yes, facts are a lot of people speculate, but Wikipedia is not the final station, we are far from a real understanding of the world, and perhaps the answer is not in the suspended logical study, and the need to rebuild our consciousness and have direct experience new facets of reality
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I do agree that Wikipedia doesn't have the final say, but it's not without merits. I'm by no means an expert on physics, but judging by the literature I have access to, the influence of mind of matter (or energy, or quantum-anything) is gravely overestimated, to say the least.
But what I don't get is this: you start your post saying science is on your side, and that we are just not accepting it, and then go on to say that "even scientists don’t understand this reality". If you're claiming to have more knowledge on the matter than scientists, than what's the source of this knowledge? What's the use in assuming there are other hidden facets of reality beyond what we can reach with science?