Sadly the testimony of some eye witnesses was not passed on by the media. The 'Britain First' claim was propaganda. Some witnesses saw three people struggling. Another witness saw a man hiding in a nearby graveyard with binoculars.
I won't go into details but this has all the hallmarks of a hit.
Even if it was she might still be alive if she was armed.
I agree. Not sure I care that she's dead though. Once I realised the regressive left will happily enable any level of violence to achieve their aims one begins to lose sympathy with them.
I'm sorry I don't agree with that no matter how strongly you disagree with her politics she doesn't deserve to be dead because of it.
What if you were a parent of one of the thousands of girls who were raped by the numerous rape gangs operating in the north? Some of the fathers of these girls were arrested for trying to rescue their daughters from imprisonment in compounds. The fathers were then prosecuted. The police and various MPs and civil servants colluded for years to protect this horrible practice. The reason for this was their mass immigration agenda. The regressive left require unlimited immigration at whatever the cost and will allow anything which furthers this agenda. Jo cox was a central part of this.
The people committing the crime are responsible in that case not Jo Cox.
And if Jo Cox made sure they weren't stopped?
You may not care that she is dead at a deep, emotional level. The problem with words is that these suggest that you are ambivalent about the murder of a wife, mother, daughter and highly respected member of her community which she served to the point that she became its representative in the House of Commons.
Her death saddened me immensely for her family and friends - you should see what she did! It also spoke of a malaise which is creeping in everywhere - the 'me' attitude. 'We' seems to have become a crusty old-fashioned attitude.
I think you've misunderstood my position. Let me give you some thoughts:
I regard the politics of the regressive left as holding almost total control of western governments. This has been engineered simply because their interests temporarily serve the interests of the establishment. (The EU, the migrant 'crisis' and the diversity agenda are bigger than any one political block. They all seems to have unlimited funding which can all be traced back to globalist financiers) Once society, the family and any sense of identity for most Europeans is broken down to nothing this sham ideology will be discarded and we will enter a banking controlled oligarchy. You might think this is paranoid. I've done enough research to know what's in the pipeline. Jo Cox, whether aware of it or not, was very much a part of this.
I never used to think about being a white person. To even ponder it seemed somehow distasteful. In the recent years I was forced to think about my identity by ever increasing levels of ridicule, blame and shaming for things I had no connection with. Now my whole family, including my baby son are supposed to share some collective guilt for murky areas of world history. Again, Jo Cox was very much a part of this thinking.
The idea that 'we' meaning the whole world, should all think collectively is perhaps the heart of the single most evil ideology created. We're taught to fear Fascism, despite the fact that the greatest slaughter in the history of mankind was carried out by the left. The Bolsheviks murdered 30 million ethnic Russians brutally in the name of peace and love and togetherness....and most importantly, collectivism.
I'm very careful when I think about that what 'we' should and shouldn't do because if history is to be taken as an example, any attempt to include the entire world in any way of thinking ALWAYS foreshadows violence on an appalling scale against those who refuse to take part.
And then we're told violence isn't the answer. Sadly, history shows that once discussion has failed, violence is always the answer. Whoever wins with violence wins totally. The British establishment is currently gearing up to treat its own people like the enemy. Jo Cox was part of this establishment and any respect they had for her means nothing to me.
In short, with her politics Jo Cox made herself an enemy of myself, of my family, of most of my friends and of any people who share my values. Passively, and in the name of collectivism, she was prepared to do violence against all of us. I don't care that she's dead. I don't care about the feelings of her husband who shared her values. It is a tragedy for her children but to mourn for two children I have never met in a world of tragedy would be hypocritical. It would be publicly signalling my virtue.
These issues are not always as simple as a flat, monotone 'Me' or 'We'....
Your words are well-met, sir. I do understand the sentiment and historical backdrop which you explain this from. If I glossed over any of this in your initial post, may offer my sincere apology for doing so, it was not intended.
The filthy mess we are in as a political population is degrading to such an extent that I fear for any grasp at 'standards'.
Two world wars against fascism and Britain is fascist in all but name. Nearly every election in the world in the past two years has retained incumbent or voted in a more right wing administration. Le Pen's acceptance is huge and gaining momentum.
My comments around 'we' as opposed to me were very much intended at the local level - family, friends, community.
To be honest, I know little of Jo Cox's political leanings. No matter what they were, I understand that they were well intentioned and motivated. Nobody deserves to die for well-intentioned and motivated views; democracy (such as we have) determines Government of the people for the people by the people.
The prospect of this moving inexorably towards some One State World, the Orwellian nightmare, is anathema.
I have spent twenty years of my life in Australia and the past five in Ecuador. Australia is well coined as a nanny state; South America is one of the last vestiges of freedom as far as I can tell. Yes, there are million and one things to moan about but the experience of day-to-day living is a world apart!
Thank you again for your well phrased response. I believe we may be in the same chapter, if not on the same page!