If that is what I said, I misspoke. I don't think of philosophy as JUST a worldview either, but at the VERY least, should INFORM one's worldview.
If you don't . . . agitate about the ways/whys shit works, I am not sure you (a person) HAVE a worldview so much as . . . possessed by one. Like the addict - at a certain point you have to wonder: are you smoking the xyz or is it smoking you?
One either ACQUIRES a worldview (culture, socialization) or BUILDS one. (and then introspects DEEPLY (hopefully) when he finds his actions don't exactly match his . . . cogitations :-)
I assume you intend to continue this series on into (more of) your conception of the science of philosophy - I look forward to it.
BTW, phronesis or "circumspective insight" could be compared to the ancient greek from which the word FAITH has been translated.
The translated word "faith" in the NT comes from the greek PISTIS, which is derived from the root word PEITHO which basically means (IN MY OPINION :-) to prove a thing true or false by evidence, argument, reason or experiment and through the guidance of your inner authority/insight.
Yeah that would have to be further researched before I could go that far. I will say that in terms of how the philosophers use the term "phronesis", often translated as "prudence" looks not to true/false, but rather as probability; which by the nature of the flux demands a more open stance toward Being than offered by logical claims of true/false. Which is what I hear Plato attempting to point out as well.
Since the roots of phronesis are related to "thinking" and "mind" and often translated as "practical wisdom" (or "prudence"), it looks to me like "phronesis" could also be easily associated with "judgment" (requiring analysis, thought, decision) which would bring in probability due to the uncertainty inherent in varying environments/conditions.