Hehe bells, that was me. I didn't even notice the author which is quite shameful. Sorry about that.
Its a terrible case of skimming a post for STEM and in STEM I can be a bit trigger happy as it suffers terribly from misuse of the tag. Which I mistakenly thought this was. I used to drop an explanation to posts I downvoted over there but it became quite an arduous task explaining the same thing over and over. Usually about the price of coins not being very STEM. In this case though, it was a genuine case of mistaken STEMity. I have fixed it now and even read the piece properly so once again, I do apologise.
Hey. If you have a legit reason then down vote. I just noticed the name.
I could actually see it as downvoted legit for the #science tag. I am not sure why I used that tag for that post. Likely because I wanted some people with scientific minds to chime in.
Nah, despite the hypocrisy I tend not to downvote authors I know when 'policing' the STEM tag. I think that is a very legit reason to use the tag and I should have paid more attention!
'policing' not being a term I am comfortable with btw but it seemed easiest way of describing it