Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     6 years ago  

    I have worked in the forest in various capacities, and here in the US it used to be the SOP to burn the 'slash' left over from logging by setting a fire on the clearcut, and that was a job I did in my youth. In 1981 I saw a fire tornado during one of those fires. We may not often see photos or video of such things, as they are often short-lived, but I would be incredulous were these things the result of advanced technology only becoming available now.

    I will reiterate my agreement with your own skepticism of what we are told our history is. I am confident that, particularly beginning with the monastic copyists, our history has been 'corrected' to reflect whatever political or religious status quo found preferable.

    However, there are some speculative questions you have recently been asking that are fairly simple to answer, if you but spend the time to research them. I have recently commented regarding the mud flood you speak of often, but have not been responded to. I am now speaking, again, of my personal experience that you can verify by asking others that have similar experience, if you do not grant that my anecdotal experience is either trustworthy, compelling, or statistically useful, regarding fire tornadoes.

    I offer my experience and grasp of these issues in the hope that you may focus on actual relevant matters, rather than be sidetracked by dis- or misinformation. Sidetracking you misleads your audience, and is a potentially highly effective way to reduce the ability of us to understand the actual problems we face in defeating our enemies.

    Please do consider my comments in the vein in which they are offered. I am not telling you that you are wrong, or being misled. I am telling you that I have observed physical events that convince me there has neither been a mud flood with global extent, nor that fire tornadoes are produced only via modern tech, and never occurred previously. I also have, and continue to, recommended that you confirm my personal representations for yourself, confident that reliable observers of similar events to my own will honestly disabuse you of misinformation.

    The bandwidth I spend watching your videos is precious to me. I get only 5 gigs per month of data. I cannot spend that precious commodity on misinformation, and find your spirit of inquiry extremely valuable - but only if you actually confirm or deny such speculations so that you can discern what is actually true. Spending a few hours, or even minutes, confirming that fire tornadoes are natural events rather than some new horror, or that a deep layer of mud does not indicate a massive global event, but is produced by regular localized events, will enable you to clarify the next questions you ask, and target actionable intelligence.

    We need that actionable intelligence.

    Thanks!

    [-]
     6 years ago  

    Hi there,
    I've just upvoted this post
    A small contribution from me, to help the steem community to thrive ;)

    [-]
     6 years ago  

    You have some great videos!

    $0.00
      Reply
      [-]
       6 years ago  

      Cool man, or should I say cold?
      =)
      /FF

      $0.00
        Reply
        [-]
         6 years ago  

        Hey Max, good show. Just wondering, does this mean you believe that basically all archaeologists are either lying or working with "false" scientific methods?

        Thanks, hugs.

        $0.00
          Reply
          [-]
           6 years ago (edited) 

          i feel like it would be possible for them, or us, to be compliant and a participant in it without us, or them being aware of it, i'll use the 'petri dish effect' as an analogy/allegory, pde is, you put microscopic things on a petri dish, and observe them with full capacity, but those, that life inside the petri dish cannot even peer out and see, the dish is entirely controlled in every aspect without its inhabitants ever knowing, this is term and definition is most applied to theories of the universe, but i am applying it to your scenario, that basically all archaeologists are lying/compliant with the lies.

          those archaeologists, us people could be complicit without ever knowing it.

          [-]
           6 years ago (edited) 

          I understand the example you use and the argument you present. But to me it feels like it's too much you know? Feels like too many people (and smart people at that) would have to live in a sort of bubble.

          Also, that would make it look like the "elite" has almost alien like power/capacity to do this. Like aliens watching us from the sky without us knowing. Seems (in my opinion) a bit far-fetched. Is it possible? Of course. But seems unlikely.

          Thanks for the different perspective though.

          $0.00
            Reply
            [-]
             6 years ago  

            Most people are unaware of how science is funded, via grants. This method of funding allows the grantors to elevate agreeable researchers to prominence, and condemns those that insist on remaining independent of such political control to penury.

            This is not a new problem, nor that has only recently become fashionable for those with money to grant. American archeology is notorious for preventing research into pre-Clovis human presence in the Americas for most of a century. Only recently have persistent researchers broken through the barriers posed by such gate-keepers to attain to peer review of their work.

            While American archeology is the most obvious and verifiable example that comes to mind, archeology generally, and all science, is susceptible. Egyptology is practically as infamous, and it is trivial for a layman to examine the claims of Egyptologists that the Pyramids and contents were made with copper chisels by people without the wheel and the evidence extant and prove this is false.

            That 'alien-like power' you refer to is just money. I have seen how it works, working as a scientist for a government in the USA. All that is necessary is a lot of money that you can spend to produce a narrative that benefits your business (a la Monsanto, Big Pharma, etc.) social control policies (Soros, Antifa, CDC, etc.) or whatever you find profitable.

            Be suspicious, particularly of claims that 4 out of 5 doctors agree, for example. If such claims were true, then smoking Camel cigarettes would have to be good for you, based on the public claims of advertisers in the 1970s.

            [-]
             6 years ago  

            I'm definitely aware of what you're speaking of and it's a reality, no doubt. It's always the magnitude of the thing that bugs me. Also, if the hipothesis is true, that Max tells about, then it brings a lot of new questions to the table and a lot more rabbit holes.

            Personally, I don't really care too much about history, I find it interesting and it would be good to know but not on my "to-do" list. Think there are more important things happening.

            Let's hope we'll have the freedom to research these things one day.

            $0.00
              Reply
              [-]
               6 years ago  

              is the video even loading for you guys?

              $0.00
                Reply
                [-]
                 6 years ago  

                I watched it. My connection is crappy, but it loaded fine. Maybe going to thecrowhouse.com (I believe that is Max's site) will enable you to watch it.

                $0.00
                  Reply
                  [-]
                   6 years ago  

                  i can't speak for the author but i myself see it like lots of people, those smart people you mention do not need to be aware that they are an active participant and or complicit in whatever is going on, without them theirselves knowing that they are actually a part of it, much like the petri dish effect, those inside the dish cannot see outside at all and they never know their entire existence is controlled, very often used as one possible theoretical metaphor about universes/existence in general, could also apply to people that you are referring to, no matter how unlikely it may or may not be.

                  it's compartmentalization, like in the armed forces, and other corporations.

                  $0.00
                    Reply
                    [-]
                     6 years ago (edited) 

                    I'm curious to know, where/how you think native american indians fit in to the mud flood scenario. To me, it seems like there are a few variations of 2 different possible answers, 1 either native american indians heritage and story is clouded, diluted and obfuscated, either whomever found the cities, grabbed some brown skin children and threw them in the woods and voila now you have tribes to along with the agenda, 1,b or its just a fabrication entirely. 2, they were the remains of the past residence at these cities that were found, they couldn't remember the truth, 3, similar to 2, but the indians did not commute or affiliated with the city people, they lived how we are told they lived, but they also have stories that corroborate mud flood/finding abandoned/buried/destroyed cities.

                    what if, some old native american stories about lost cities refer to some of these things.

                    also, just one more thing to add, people do infact still build outrageous shit like this today, in 2018.. but not just any people, ridiculously rich, RICH people... but, to be fair... alot of the times when these people want a gilded/victorian type art/architecture, they almost entirely never ever pay a contractor to build new, they buy the old remnants and have them transported to their new location, even rooms and large chunks of these old houses.

                    this is all becoming more and more possible to me, i mean while it's 100% possible, at first it is almost harder to believe that a cataclysm of such magnitude and cover up happened 150+ years ago, than it is compared to thinking the earth is flat, but now after like 3 days, not only am i like it's 100% possible, because yeah not one single person from 1860 is alive today, you know no one, NO ONE who was alive back then, so not only is anything possible, first you were told.. catastrophe only happenes millions of years apart, then a decade later, we are told its more frequent, on a scale of only a few 100k years, then we are told (most recently) that it is indeed even more frequent, as close as 12,600 years ago.

                    so why not... get ready to be told it's even more frequent, only 160 years ago. I'm just hung up on how the native american indians fit into it all. Some of those sunken buildings, it would make sense to have atleast one window on those bottom floors, because even in homes your basement has to have windows, as a fire rule your home wont be approved via inspection unless every bedroom thats going to eventually have a person in it, HAS TO HAVE A WINDOW.

                    so i'm not sure how inspection code worked back then, it is a little odd seeing 100 windows wrapping around a building on the bottom floor, but like i said if each of those windows is for a room a piece, it's the same thing we do today, it's why apartments still have their bottom floors with windows, you wake up to an irrate fire burning up 3 quarters of the building, you cant run upstairs to go through the ground level door/window, might not even be able to leave through your front door at all, thats why you have the window there, but that's different and isn't the explanation for everything or something like Selection_360.png

                    thanks for your content.

                    $0.00
                      Reply
                      [-]
                       6 years ago (edited) 

                      Love the intro quote... striking at the root (as usual)!!

                      yes, the manipulation starts at the vibration level.

                      $0.00
                        Reply