I'm a huge fan of Graham Hancock. I've been reading his books and following his appearances on YouTube for years. The more time has past, the more evidence comes to light to support his theories. Archaeology isnt a precise science, relying on incomplete evidence to postulate theories. People like Hancock, Schoch and Cremo, challenge the accepted interpretations of evidence, with equally plausible and valid theories. I'm often left non plussed by the attitudes of mainstream archeology, where old ideas are dogmatically clung to, with an almost religious zeal, even in the light of new evidence. Great post, thank you, and I really look forward to seeing more.