VC
Here is Rohan from Justinian Deception Youtube channel. https://rumble.com/c/c-5047954?e9s=src_v1_cmd
A supplementation for your burn the corp site.
What sets the Justinian Deception guys apart is not only their knowledge...but they were the first ever to discover the existence of two different types of birthing certificates, which exposes the psuedo trust triangle Papal Bull set up the Vatican shafted the entire world with.
These guys are the first guys to get the birth certificate that proves the legal fiction/debtor/surname is something else entire...naturally breaking the assumption of law that we are persons. The next step beyond that is to completely jump off ship, by returning everything back to the state, including documentation of the non-surname legal person...returning to the place of man.
Most guys such as Santos Bonnaci; David Lecester; David Miller of the Quantum Grammer method; the "human frequency" guys over on odysee with their American Assumed Name Certificate method; the Hornsey school method in England, utilizing the legal fiction and registering as a LTD company in the hopes to avoid legal attacks (LOL); or Lawful Rebellion guys who go with the Magna Carta 1215; or even others such as Jez of the Lawful Rebellion youtube channel; even such people from the Freeman movement; or the Common Law Courts movement; even David Murphy aka dmurphy25 on odysee, and anyone else in this movement, are all operating still under the SURNAME/surname legal person debtor office/account in the trust triangle Papal Bull Vatican shafting.
I had known a guy in England since my odysee days in 2021, when i had a channel of 700+ subs on Extricate The System 1.0. This man same age as you, carpenter by trade, had left the system cold turkey as mentioned above 15 years ago, whilst still retaining his house, though he has no bank account, no driver license, no passport, as all these pertain to the legal person...you must play the role of a legal person to get these "privileges"...
Four the last four years he's been educating me on the system and his way of leaving...i recently uploaded it to my blog on my site, under "Strange Reflections"...i present it to you here:
(click the Nov 2025 link)
https://brave-smoke.com/strange-reflections/
or https://brave-smoke.com/a-spiritually-legal-explaination/
People are afraid of all this meta data, this digital ID crap, this new agenda lockdown. My question is...who are you pinning the crime to...most likely the legal fiction. I can prove the legal person is something else entire...so where are you capturing my meta data?
And why are you putting my biometrics, my photo, my face, my bodily movements on an account on your online computer game called your admiralty martime legal system, that is not mine? Why did you make an account for me in this system? WHat's it gotta do with me?
This is where the JD guys shine...if you find time, have a listen here...it is well worth thy time...no joke!
(part 2 also on my channel)
A quick look at the first link shows that all those videos are a year old. Does the JD entity still exist? Also, can you link the specific discussions of Birth Certificate information, and the subsequent steps to restore lawful sovereignty?
I am attempting to use a different system, in the belief that contracts I have not signed do not lawfully obligate me, and my signature on fraudulent contracts that use deception to trick me into giving up my sovereignty (because I am not provided information regarding the true mechanism of registration, of my birth, my title to real property, my car, and etc., and am not informed that sovereigns have allodial title, which is theft by fraud in which government is the primary mechanism of enslavement, and corrupt courts a principal in imposing that theft), I am acting on mutual agreements between sovereigns outside of that legal system that has been utterly corrupted and is become a weapon against humanity, with goodwill as the means of exchange. This is not an easy thing to do, first, because I have to devise such mechanisms without prior examples to base them on, nominal to replace the legal system that has been developed for millennia, and which most people don't even conceive isn't lawful and obligatory, and then I must also inspire and recruit others to transact with me via this novel system.
I mostly do these things without going into detail at all, or even discussing them, simply by creating goodwill balances with good people, whom faithfully deliver what I need from them they can provide upon request when I am in need. There is no quid pro quo, because the burden of creating specific mutual understanding outside of recorded contracts (which invoke the corrupted system) is insuperable. In fact I did not fully comprehend the system I was avoiding myself, much less have the ability to explain it to others, until BurnTheCorporateFiction laid bare to me the foundation and structure upon it of the system stealing sovereignty. I almost always 'overpay' as a result, because when I need something, I need it, and I have learned it is more likely to be available when it is far below the value of goodwill I have on account. I also handle lesser things with cash, because it is expensive in labor to buy fuel, for example, otherwise. Losing cash will dramatically raise my expenses, because of this.
The issue is that you, the sovereign, are being assigned to the legal fiction when that metadata is used against you. If you successfully challenge the legal fiction, then there is no alternate legal mechanism to use the metadata against the sovereign (There is no potential to discuss the law with AI, that will simply act as it's programmed without any ability for you to challenge its jurisdiction. That is why we will be forced to use digital ID, with our biometrics linked to the legal fiction by default. Having the biometric features the legal fiction is assigned will be probative to AI and define your meatsicle as the legal fiction. There will be no appeal if you are assigned digital ID - which they are prepared to issue without your consent, and will apply to you whether you ever use it or not. They have your biometric data, from DNA to facial recognition. It is impossible to prevent them from capturing this biometric information on us, and in many real ways privacy is literally impossible to maintain, such as metadata we generate with the entities we interact with conducting our affairs. These entities consider their interactions generate their own data, that they can dispose as they see fit, because it's their property. Your data about those interactions is also yours, but that's not their data about their interactions with you they own just as much as you own your data about your interactions with them. When that data is centralized by selling it to brokers, a copy of your data specific to you becomes created by that centralization of all the entities' data you have interacted with, and there's no sound lawful basis to prevent that centralization. Private property is private property, and if you argue your property is yours, you cannot also argue their property is yours. Privacy is obviated by accounting technology, and that is a fact of tech advance).
It is the use of this data applied to a fraudulent legal fiction that is unlawful, and enabling AI to govern eliminates the law entirely. That is the threat today facing us, and why I have never once used AI - because that implies consent to interacting with AI at all. I do not consent, and cannot be shown to have ever consented to handing over my data to AI I know to be AI. Insofar as any legal system will exist such consent will not be found, and my ability to opt out of being regulated by AI should be maintained because I have not consented, ever, implicitly or otherwise, to interacting with AI. I doubt AI will care, however.
Of course, armed violence remains an option to pedopaths to crush dissent, and the only answer to that is superior arms, which are unlawfully proscribed sovereigns in every jurisdiction on Earth, so the ability to defend yourself from AI controlled drones will be considered unlawful by AI a priori, and there is no help for that but to successfully defend yourself from it with superior arms, which is not reasonably possible because AI can nuke you from space. That leaves only being concealed and operating as a sovereign covertly. But that, as already discussed, is impossible in a surveillance state, too.
All said, the time is now, before AI is imposed, to prevent total enslavement and genocide of humanity. AI is the eradication of law, replacing law with tech. It is unlawful, but without a legal system that operates lawfully, there is only recourse to violence or secrecy, both of which seem to be impossible in practice as well - unless we act before we are genocided while we have superior numbers and that ability to impose the nominal violence to eliminate the polity(s) eliminating the law.
Of course, death takes us all - but not institutions, nor AI. We must succeed as a society, which alone has the potential to persist outside of institutions or AI, and persist permanently to oppose them. Homogeneous societies are highly potential of such resistance, which is why societies are being heterogenized, which renders them less competent to act the more heterogeneous they are.
I will have a look at your other links presently. The issues discussed above pertain regardless of legal fictions, however, and require our attention.
Thanks!
I do understand that dog latin and English aren't the same language, even though they use words in common, those words mean different things in the latin on the documents. This all makes sense to me now, once I understood the historical background and how registration was slyly used to acquire title by the state, which eliminated allodial title and enabled property tax. This same technique is used for personal property as well. While the WEF says by 2030 we won't have any property, that's really already the case, and most people don't even know it! I appreciate very much the background information on Rohan and Romley, as it makes clear why that content isn't presently continuing to be produced.