Well you have points but i think utopia needs to have a room of ethics for new mods. If things goes well fine, no one wish to stay when things are bad (only 0.00001 exist), id things goes bad in the sense of post rejection, the mod needs to start understandably the reasons for such action except the post itself is a fraud( still only approach will define it). Some contributors may have learn the bad way from friends, mods can change their mentality see them evolving into a great positive contributor.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Some contributors just won't change, they only want the approval, they forget that mods contributions sometimes get rejected too. They want it all to themselves.
If utopian was to design a system where moderator can be reviewed today.
Contributors that gave positive review on a particular mod when they got approval will still give the moderator negative review when they get rejected.