How to avoid analysis paralysis

in #life7 years ago

What is analysis paralysis?

People who have a tendency to make data driven decisions have a vulnerability. That vulnerability is analysis paralysis. All decisions have time constraints. Some decisions have more time constraints than others. Attention of the decision maker is scarce and this is one of the insights from the attention based view of the firm. The attention based view of the firm recognizes that the most scarce resource in a firm is the attention. This in some ways is an interesting intercourse with the resource based view of the firm. Root cause analysis is a method of actually defining a problem which is key to searching for a solution effectively.

More on root cause analysis

The five whys is one method of applying root cause analysis.

5 Whys is an iterative interrogative technique used to explore the cause-and-effect relationships underlying a particular problem.[1] The primary goal of the technique is to determine the root cause of a defect or problem by repeating the question "Why?" Each answer forms the basis of the next question. The "5" in the name derives from an anecdotal observation on the number of iterations needed to resolve the problem.

Not all problems have a single root cause. If one wishes to uncover multiple root causes, the method must be repeated asking a different sequence of questions each time.

Some methods of dealing with analysis paralysis I have used

  • Trust the methodology. I realize that the process is what is important to solving a problem not the mood I'm in at the moment.
  • Follow best practices. This allows me to set rules to make solving certain problems quicker. In essence I apply ready made recipes based on what has worked most times in the past. This does not always work.
  • Set a time limit and accept that perfect will not exist because of that limit. While I do have the motivation to achieve perfection, I remind myself that perfection isn't ever going to be possible. I simply accept that I must do my best under the constraints. The constraints include stuff I can change or control and stuff I cannot change. I focus on what I can change and the limits are that which I cannot change or control. The time limit is due to the fact that I recognize what I cannot control, and so I seek the highest quality analysis under the constraints.
  • Ask for help, sometimes others have an ability to analyze a piece of a problem to allow me to explore the solution space more thoroughly and quickly. The solution space is the possible solutions which haven't been thought of or tried, or which have been tried in the past, such as how lawyers look up cases to figure out precedents.

References

Mann, D. (2002). Analysis paralysis: When root cause analysis isn’t the way. The TRIZ Journal, 5.

Ocasio, W. (1997). Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic management journal, 187-206.

Sort:  

People don’t seem to realise that not making a decision is making a decision. It’s good to make the best decision possible based on the data availiable but it’s vital to make a decision

I knew someone named Dana Edwards a some time ago and I just wonder... Is LeTourneau University your Alma Mater?

thats great post
health is very important for every body
i like it
thanks for sharing a valuable things
keep it on

Nice post
Please help vote me brother

nice writing on life .thanks for sharing your opiniou

intresting post @dana-edwards .good too see your post about analysis paralysis

nice blog...
thats good..
thanks for sharing...
best of luck

Many of us are in this life, the person who makes the hurried hurry will experience depression. because many hasty decisions have gone wrong. if want it must think carefully.

@mulyadi.alwi

very usefull post, thanks for it ;)

Awesome upvote?

Loading...

Fibe whys, very powerful concept. Will remember that for myself! Thanks for sharing!

Many times less is more and in the case of paralysis analysis I've found this to hold true.

An example is trading crytpocurrency. There are dozens of indicators you can look at, but in the end I find that just makes deciding more difficult as you have so much information, many of which does not line up. Thus, I use price data, volume and support/resistance levels. Done and done, my decisions are more efficient and trading is better.

The five whys are also described in John Rossman's, The Amazon Way: 14 Leadership Principles Behind the World's Most Disruptive Company. I reviewed that, back in 2016: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3. The five whys were covered in part 3/principle 12. Another relevant principle from that book is: "Have a Bias for Action", which is principle 8, covered in Part 2.

Just wondering about your "best practices" part, sticking to that, how do you know you won't come up with something better or something else that applies to different situations. Or is that what you meant by "This does not always work?"

Joe
@joe.nobel
science fiction, fantasy, erotica
check out some posts, no obligation to follow or upvote

To avoid analysis-paralysis, it is important to figure out how much precision you need before data reference.

charming & exhilarated!