You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The mainstream interpretation of the Bible, and the esoterically True interpretation of the Bible.

in #life7 years ago

I can see where you're coming from, but I'd like to object!

  • Believing that God is Imagination, instantly denies any concept of good and bad. For me at least.
  • Anything exists in God (Imagination) and anything we want to experience we may then experience. It's just a matter of being that which you wish you would be.
  • What we call Good and Bad exists alike, without separation, in Imagination. There is no distinction. Man can become anything they can imagine, if they place themselves in that position.

There is no + and -, there is no left and right. There is just that which you imagine yourself to experience. That which you imagine yourself that you are experiencing.

Thanks for the comment!

Sort:  

It is not true... slaves on the ships from africa couldn't imagine what they will be...
You can be something else than what you can imagine -> you can be something else than God ;)

If you understand the esoteric concept of God, you understand that there is nothing else beside God, also called The All.

I understand but esoteric concepts are nothing else than new religion. And if someone saying Everything is God so that mean nothing more than different word for Everything... and Everything has no personality, has no feeling, has no intelligence, has no perception and so on... If some esoteric man say God is blah blah blah - it is just wishful thinking

I beg to differ. If Everything had no personality, no feelings, no intelligence and no perception, then you wouldn't have them as well.

You are, as I am, a fractal impersonation of that "Everything".

You seem to have a real rigid belief system yourself. Not judging, just a first impression.

"I beg to differ. If Everything had no personality, no feelings, no intelligence and no perception, then you wouldn't have them as well."
Really?????? In this sentence is no logic. Hey that what I am talking about, blindness and wishful thinking....

I know sounds logically but that is not true! If it is true than you can proof it on any example of everything.

But I now know believers needs examples from real world. :)

What personality then have Siamese twins?
https://www.google.cz/search?q=siamese+twin&client=opera&hs=IA1&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwimz5CJ4p_VAhUW02MKHRjoBMwQ_AUICigB&biw=1855&bih=985
If you think like: Siamese twins is everything. Than one twin have one personality and other have second personality. But together have no personality... Got it!

Please start questioning these esoteric logic mind traps.

I can't see much logic in you're perspective as well. Just blind belief and wishful thinking in regards to scientism.

I know that that your perspective may sound logical to you, but it isn't True.

I haven't considered the subject you're offering yet, but I'll give it a go.

Siamese twins is just a simple malformation in nature. It's something natural, happens all the time.
The thing is that since they both have their own operating centers (heads) they can both form their own personality.
That is normal. But it also happens that one person has two different, distinct personalities. That's also normal. You can at all time act as whoever you want to act. There's no restriction to that. One individual might create two, or even more personalities for the different things they do in life. And they always switch between those personalities. We ALL do this to different extents. But there are these multi-personality disorder individuals who create such different personalities, that it's like they become someone else when they embody each of the personalities.
In you Mind is Everything. Your Imagination is capable of Everything. You can choose to act as any other personality withing this world. That has died, that is alive, or even that doesn't exist yet. But that posibility is still within the range of your Imagination.

Please start questioning these "scientismical" logic mind traps.

I can imagine that the whole does not have the property of parts. I am really not in any mine traps ;)