I think we can't compare things like giving and share at the same time, we shared toys don't mean that we give the toys. Protecting ourselves first before helping others don't mean that we're selfish. I will say No to everyone if I can't give or help them due to my own situation, but will be the first one to say yes if I have no reason to refuse it at all.
Maybe it's different in the real life and different backgrounds of people. Yes, there're different values in the community too. But as a person, you're free to decide based on your own values and conscience. The best things to do that interaction to find a win-win solution. Giving but hurting (the giver or the taker) will never be a win-win solution- IMHO
You make some very good points!
Sharing and giving - sometimes the words are used to mean the same thing, but as you say there is (or can be) a difference. And the meanings of the two words is an interesting thing to think about.
And yes, different backgrounds, different cultures and values are part of it too.
Mostly I think it feels good to give (or share) and be a helpful person when you can. But when you can't help, give, or share - it's not always for a selfish reason. Sometimes you just can't help.
You are Absolutely right! People must learn that..everyone can be a giver and a taker at the same time for a different benefits but shouldn't thought or felt that a giver will be a giver forever or vise versa.
I shared my lunch with someone, probably i shared the cost of lunch box too with him/her. But when I gave my lunch for someone..means that I gave it all and my taken is a happy smile of that someone😊