The imminent TAX on Cryptocurrency: evidence, thoughts and opinions...
I developed the very FIRST anonymous payment gateway. This was documented by UBC and the filing was planet wide.
To make a long story short I got burned. Things may happen yet, there are recent talks but the forces and offers you can not refuse seem to be involved.
I don't have the legal clout, the blue blood, the power of controlling societies behind me. I am just a man.
I do know you can not patent an idea only a system and method. Protected within are the claims. Life is not fair for regular Joe... Money can move mountains, threats, bribes and large legal attacks with stop most.
Dates of invention still exist, copyright and evidence of legal fraud from the banking cartel and legal departments are also documented.
I tell you this to let you know. I have seen the clues early on.
I have nothing to lose. You need to know this story.
With filed documents dated, stamped and evidenced with many witnesses.
They will try and TAX CRYPTO.
Don't believe?
The secretive Bilderberg Group is set to discuss plans to implement an Internet ID to eviscerate anonymity on the web as well as a global tax on financial transactions and air travel, according to an inside source who spoke to Infowars.
http://www.infowars.com/bilderberg-leak-secretive-group-to-discuss-internet-id-global-tax/
Is this evidence?
Not yet... Let's discuss... If an Id is needed and your country files this in a registry this would be a benefit.
benefit
- n. any profit or acquired right or privilege, primarily through a contract. 2) in worker's compensation the term "benefit" is the insurance payment resulting from a fatal accident on the job, while "compensation" is for injury without death. 3) in income taxation, anything that brings economic gain. 4) "fringe benefits" are rights from employment other than salary or wages, including health or disability insurance. 5) v. to gain a benefit. (See: contract)
Right
In an abstract sense, justice, ethical correctness, or harmony with the rules of law or the principles of morals. In a concrete legal sense, a power, privilege, demand, or claim possessed by a particular person by virtue of law.
Each legal right that an individual possesses relates to a corresponding legal duty imposed on another. For example, when a person owns a home and property, he has the right to possess and enjoy it free from the interference of others, who are under a corresponding duty not to interfere with the owner's rights by trespassing on the property or breaking into the home.
In Constitutional Law, rights are classified as natural, civil, and political. Natural rights are those that are believed to grow out of the nature of the individual human being and depend on her personality, such as the rights to life, liberty, privacy, and the pursuit of happiness.
Civil Rights are those that belong to every citizen of the state, and are not connected with the organization or administration of government. They include the rights of property, marriage, protection by law, freedom to contract, trial by jury, and the like. These rights are capable of being enforced or redressed in a civil action in a court.
Political rights entail the power to participate directly or indirectly in the establishment or administration of government, such as the right of citizenship, the right to vote, and the right to hold public office.
Privilege
A particular benefit, advantage, or Immunity enjoyed by a person or class of people that is not shared with others. A power of exemption against or beyond the law. It is not a right but, rather, exempts one from the performance of a duty, obligation, or liability.
***contract - n. an agreement with specific terms between two or more persons or entities in which there is a promise to do something in return for a valuable benefit known as consideration. Since the law of contracts is at the heart of most business dealings, it is one of the three or four most significant areas of legal concern and can involve variations on circumstances and complexities. The existence of a contract requires finding the following factual elements: a) an offer; b) an acceptance of that offer which results in a meeting of the minds; c) a promise to perform; d) a valuable consideration (which can be a promise or payment in some form); e) a time or event when performance must be made (meet commitments); f) terms and conditions for performance, including fulfilling promises; g) performance. A unilateral contract is one in which there is a promise to pay or give other consideration in return for actual performance. (I will pay you $500 to fix my car by Thursday; the performance is fixing the car by that date). A bilateral contract is one in which a promise is exchanged for a promise. (I promise to fix your car by Thursday and you promise to pay $500 on Thursday). Contracts can be either written or oral, but oral contracts are more difficult to prove and in most jurisdictions the time to sue on the contract is shorter (such as two years for oral compared to four years for written). In some cases a contract can consist of several documents, such as a series of letters, orders, offers and counteroffers. There are a variety of types of contracts: "conditional" on an event occurring; "joint and several," in which several parties make a joint promise to perform, but each is responsible; "implied," in which the courts will determine there is a contract based on the circumstances. Parties can contract to supply all another's requirements, buy all the products made, or enter into an option to renew a contract. The variations are almost limitless. Contracts for illegal purposes are not enforceable at law. 2) v. to enter into an agreement. (See: consideration, contract of adhesion, unilateral contract, bilateral contract, oral contract)
It is speculative but how about history?
There is a global currency war going on now, the times are shocking to any paying any attention to world politics..Especially in an economic crisis or a war, the pressure to inflate becomes overwhelming. Any alternative may seem politically disastrous. Whether it be the Roman emperors repeatedly debasing their coinage, the French revolutionary government printing a flood of assignats, John Law flooding France with debased money, or the Continental Congress issuing money until it was literally "not worth a Continental," the story is similar.
A government in financial straits finds its easiest recourse is to issue more and more money until the money loses its value. The entire process is accompanied by a barrage of explanations, propaganda and new regulations which hide the true situation from the eyes of most people until they have lost all their savings. In World War I, Germany -- like other governments -- borrowed heavily to pay its war costs.
This led to inflation, but not much more than in the U.S. during the same period. After the war there was a period of stability, but then the inflation resumed. By 1923, the wildest inflation in history was raging.
Often prices doubled in a few hours. A wild stampede developed to buy goods and get rid of money. By late 1923 it took 200 billion marks buy a loaf of bread.
Millions of the hard-working, thrifty German people found that their life's savings would not buy a postage stamp. They were penniless. How could this happen in a highly civilized nation run at the time by intelligent, democratically chosen leaders? What happened to business, to wages and employment? How did some people manage to save their capital while a few speculators made fortunes?
The Years 1914-1921
When the war broke out on July 31, 1914, the Reichsbank (German Central Bank) suspended redeemability of its notes in gold. After that there was no legal limit as to how many notes it could print. The government did not want to upset people with heavy taxes. Instead it borrowed huge amounts of money which were to be paid by the enemy after Germany had won the war, Much of the borrowing was discounted and monetized by the Reichsbank. As explained later, this amounted to issuing straight printing press money.
Borrowed the money?
Anyone awake yet?
It's a big club and u ain't in it.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tGk5ioEXlIM
This is coming, I don't know how it all turns out. Probably some Artificial Intelligence Borg type thing.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lHcTKWiZ8sI
The blockchain is awesome and not going away. At first I thought the banks were afraid, this unstoppable unchangeable ledger.
It's like the largest unregulated penny stock. Full of theft, pump and dumps, fraud, laundering etc etc.
I think regulation is pre planned. We all know regulation is bullshit. I mean we have presidential candidates knocking people off to hide treason.
It's a crazy world now.
We have no justice, trust is tough as even Steemit got hacked of value. It can not be insured as it is not Legal Tender.... But yet Goldman Sacs, JP Morgan and Merrill are already heavily involved. In token private system money?
I do always reserve the right to change my mind. Most of this is opinion. What is your opinion?
Do we all have to get private islands?