You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: LBRY (LBC): End of Correction Could be Near

in #lbry7 years ago

Haejin fans, we do not want to remove all of haejin's rewards, just the 71% that is provided by himself and 1 other person. Over the past 100 days he has received upvotes from 16590 people and 16588 are responsible for 29% of his rewards, the other 2 are himself and ranchoralexo.

Upvoting himself at such high rates might cause other whales to do the same and if all the whales did that then everyones upvote would be worth 0. What we want you to do is to support us in stopping haejin from setting a precedent like this, help us save the community.

Sort:  

The whole steem system needs work, but Dan is so focused on EOS he has no time. STEEMIT is built to reward people who give value to the communitu, Haejin does that. Yes he is a bussiness man and is trying to make as much money from this GOLD RUSH as possible, but Haejin is GIVING VALUE TO THE COMMUNITY.

90% or more of his followers only have an account on STEEMIT because of him so to say he doesnt deserve his money is simply WRONG.

Yea - he provides his "analysis" for "free" . . .

16588 people provide 29% of his rewards... That he does deserve. The other 71% is abusive


For what I know @ranchoralexo has come to 'fight' @berniesanders and @randowhale that are those who began this flag war. I'm ok about self upvoting, should just be prohibited, steemit rules have to change on that, until then it's just natural @haejin or others upvotes themselves (or create bots multiaccounts to upvote themselves but that's what @bernisanders does not @haejin ...)

@ranchoralx started upvoting first. You realize the blockchain is open to everyone right? You can literally look and see how it all started. So STFU and do some research before you open your ignorant mouth