Sure then we agree on opinons and that good @cicbar ) So when you say limit SP, at what level would you like to see that imposed ??
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Sure then we agree on opinons and that good @cicbar ) So when you say limit SP, at what level would you like to see that imposed ??
We can discuss that. In my opinion 50000SP is enough.
Well I do see what you are getting at by this opinion on SP, 50,000 is alot of SP and would always i think generate an income which would satisfy the needs of most normal living human beings sure ! But this is an old argument that I have seen since the beginning on Steemit where people have suggesdted limiting SP ownership and having it like you say capped ! But I think you will find many not agreeing with this as again it does smack of a " socialistic " politic ! I am happy to let others fight over this ! At my point intime it does not concern me too much ! I have invested into SP and post evereyday and recieve moderate rewards, buts its ok ! I just want to see the platform thrive ! If people want to buy big chunck of SP i think they should be able to and its a good thing for everyone, big and small when they do !!
There is some info that maybe developers will change that trending page will be according to number of votes instead of voting power weight. That can still be manipulated but at least some minnows will have more chance to be seen and SP will mean less for influence on trending page than before...
But then posts getting huge rewards won't be visible to the general public which opens hundreds of doors for abuse. Not to mention that advertisers will stop buying steem and SBD to advertise here.
It will be visible because usually people with large SP have lot of followers and they will still get many votes.
I think separate top voted and top rewarded would work, nothing stops a whale from making a throwaway account and making a posts with tags like #ghjkesdu and upvoting them to fuck apart from the trending page.
+1