Yes, Steemit is the biggest and the best. The sooner the world understand this and joins the bandwagon, the better. God bless us
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Yes, Steemit is the biggest and the best. The sooner the world understand this and joins the bandwagon, the better. God bless us
Exactly, There is no alternative of steemit in every sector. Specially Utopian make me very hopeful about steemit. @dwight50
I was reading the comments, and I agree, steemit is the best social network that exists and practically the only one I use.
But we do not have to say only the good. We have to say the positive and the negative.
And this is a good place to say them.
Steemit has many positive things. Maybe the majority. But he also has negatives that have to be kept in mind.
One of the negatives is the bad distribution of wealth.
It is being achieved equalize the distribution of real world wealth,
where very few have much and many have very little.
This leads to another negative thing inside steemit, "the purchase-sale of votes", that I personally do not use because it seems to me a lack of total ethics for the purpose that this platform has, but is used by many so that his posts may have little more than $ 0.10, and the only thing that achieves this is to give to those who have more and that others not grow, also that also generates many scams. And this generates the third and greatest negative situation. People leave steemit.
Thousands of new accounts were created recently, but how many are active?
we must get new users to stay in steemit and trust it and give value to the platform, and do not leave or just publish 150 photos per day to get 0.01 in each of those post and destroying the block chain
And if the vast majority of people (the minnows) leave steemit which are the ones that feed the whales, What would be the future of steemit?
It is dying the main purpose of the platform is to create original content and quality and be rewarded for that.
I think that for steemit to become, not only the best, but the main social network in the world, even more than Facebook, we must to solve those negative things, and that the growth or not within steemit be the original and quality content and the creation of projects to collaborate with the community and attract new users.
Then, we must improve the distribution of wealth. How?
with important delegations to different communities, and within them to those people who work to grow it and steemit. If this happens, people will grow up within steemit and not abandon it, and will grow trust in the currency (steem sbd). And trust increases its value.
On the other hand, I do not know if it should be prohibited , but we must create awareness that votes should not be bought. For there to be sellers, there must be buyers.
I repeat, steemit is the best social network that exists, and could become the most important in the future. But if we dont say things, if we just say "steemit is the best" the future is doubtful,
And it may end up happening that those who have millions still have them, but they will be millions of nothing.
I really liked your opinion hence I followed you @matuca. You're opinion is more about transparency and fairness when it comes to wealth distribution. I'm new, but I liked the idea that people who does the work should earn more based on that good work. But isn't the creation of decentralization of the blockchain based on that concept of idea? Anyhow, I read an article that EOS IO is going to be super great. It's okay to have steemit and EOS (whenever it's launched) account, is it not? Btw, thank you so much for sharing your thoughtful opinion.
I think it should be like that.
Yes of course, I do not think it will be incompatible to have an account on both platforms.
Thanks for reading and giving your opinion.-
You're very welcome. Likewise, thank you.