Sachin or Kohli, who is the best batsman of all time?

in #kolhivsshachin6 years ago

maxresdefault.jpg
So far, though comparisons are comparatively little to many, Kohli is better than Sachin because he is better than Sachin. How big Virat Kohli is batting for a few years, that is just one difference level. So good, so much the constant!

Now, in this comparison, I discuss a little about what I think.

Those who have seen Sachin at peak and seeing big stars, they are really lucky. Two different batsmen. But there is no fatigue in running. Many years ago, when I got Sachin batting, I would have been 'bored' - bowlers did not give any chance, they would run away, they would not stop. Now Kohli does so.

With the times of cricket the batsman has become the game. Since Twenty20, all the facilities are available for the batsmen only. From the flat pitches to the batting power play, things are now turning out of the middle of a long, long circle, the rules have been fixed. Gap increased, spinners' challenges too. The biggest problem is that people do not talk about it - two new ones are played from two sides, there is nothing more for spinners than one-day cricket. Earlier the middle of the innings had the opportunity to spin off the soft, but now it is not. Hard balls are almost new in the whole innings.

Now 300/350 runs in ODIs are now casual. Many aggressions in the mentality of the batsmen due to T20 I can not find the bowler. Not a good off-spinner, no one is a leg-spinner, not a fast bowler. Kohli had some flows or there was. Out of the off stamps, there are problems in the swing, and the leg spin too is seen to be difficult. But these places will take advantage of, I do not see such a bowler. Now runs in England but seeing very much type of batting very close in the near future, Kohli is seeing me.

But why not all of them can run like Kohli? Because only Kohli really is so good. To good Lutuputu of early swollen cheeks may have worn off the body's last fat by doing a great hard work. Very hard working. Struggle for a few days at the beginning, then it is going to be extinguished itself, there is no challenge ahead.

Cricket has gone through a huge change in the past one year. Great could be successful like that at the time? I think he would do well. He has that capability. But at least 10,000 runs in such a short time or so fast I could not believe that so many milestones could fly.

Comparing the geniuses of different times, it is actually tough. Silly Many do not want to compare someone with Viv Richards when talking about the best batsman in one-day internationals. The best bowlers are literally scared to bow down to Viv. The conditions for the batsmen were much stronger then for the batsmen. Although hearing this, a Cricinfo app from today's time will laugh out this claim by exploring various information data. This is the most tragic thing in modern times - 'Statisticians'! Nowadays, we can extract a lot of 'good' footballs from Zidane, Ronaldinho by checking the Aussies, goals etc.
It is a matter of respect for Kohli, it is now compared to Sachin. Sachin's last level of comparison in ODI format But how did Anderson of the last generation take the test of Kohli's technique (and Kohli is trying to cross it). It would have been good to see some such batting in ODIs. Kohli himself could have got the opportunity to take himself upstairs. For a few years he has made the thing more monotonous.

Now Kohli will not say well than Sachin, but if it continues for several more years, maybe it might be another time to think. He is a genius.