if you choose to be this , hwo to put it, closed of to understanding... Then philosophy clearly isnt your thing. I now see. you are wrong in your asumtion of what my intention was of what I wronte, AND, you re wrong in asuming any reader whould agree with you. Because I DONT, for one.

I did CLEARLY communicate what i want from my perspective and understanding of the words used, with the words contained in the language used. you still CHOOSE to not understand. So i can only asume you do not understand the words used. As in not actually understanding the language used.

But ok, if you like missunderstanding and lying to your readers then thats ur choise.
The article here is REGARDLESS communicating a lie, being a false clame of what I intended in the comment. As your words in this article is not even close to what i wrote.

The only way, if you actually intend to understand, to resolve this, is to do so via a chat or something where you can spesifically ask what your confusion is.