You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Responsibility to End Evil

in #justice6 years ago

She bid her time and enacted the vengeance she deemed appropriate.

Not appropriate, but necessary to get out of the sittuation.

The reason why you should not and cannot do that under the law is that you weren't defending yourself anymore, you were literally taking vengeance or revenge at that point.

Some women in this sittuation retaliate when the man is asleep. The other in a direct reaction to the humiliation. In this case, it is defense.

You can't look at every case through paragraphs. It is important to take into consideration psychology of the people. Being beaten regularly for five years with apologizes coming right after or without them, both changes the way people think to a great extent. Law should not be translated to favor abusers over their victims.

There is no justified murder.

I disagree. Past records a lot of murders pardoned by the independent courts.

Sort:  

That cannot be true unless she saw absolutely no other way like he was a powerful and well-known figure in the community and she literally had nowhere to go to, no family, no friends and not one social service or public service that she was aware of.

As I stated before, you need to take psychology of the people in the consideration. Cutting one's bounds to family is the first thing an abuser does, before he becomes more violent. You forget the psychology. Lawbooks is not how minds of people work. It is how we should judge in case the person was completely alright when comitting a crime.

By the way, you are a lawyer, aren't you?