Thanks For your reply and recommendations to read other posts. I've done that and I admire Dans vision and actions he takes,but as any other person with different background, i disagree on some things too. It is indeed correct that our planet is our (including all the other animals and creatures) common heritage, it is correct that just because someone is born later then other, he shouldn't have disadvantage on common heritage. But with increasing automation and upcoming A.I. technology, most of our basic needs should be solved and human labour will be minimised almost to zero, and technically we eventually will stay with doing only creative jobs, like being scientists, artists, musicians, space explores, gardeners, ecologists e.t.c. simply because we are very curious creatures and when a person does what he loves, the work itself becomes a reward ( if basic needs are fulfilled unconditionally ). And that is part of what Jacque Fresco was offering. Same as Jacque , i believe that nothing should be a private property, and everything should be common. And because there's enough resources to fulfill all our needs and because pretty soon we will have technical possibility to achieve it, everyone will have higher standard of living then the wealthiest people of today. But Jacques vision, requires a vision on the future, without looking through prism of past. Resources need to be moved from one place to another, simply because there's a necessity to do so,not because there's some money or credits that paid for them to be moved. They need to be moved because it will benefit everyone, including environment that we live in, and shouldn't have anything to do with profit to anyone (unless profit becomes common wealth and doesn't harm environment). I wish we could have this debate face to face one day, meeting like minded people and looking on matters from different angles can bring each other to right and effective conclusions. Maybe one day we will be on the same continent.