Sort:  

That's only because a lot of noobs have decided to trust Matt. To intensify their trust, it is important to reject the haters. And reject them openly. That post does exactly that. A classic Internet Marketing style.

I hope and wish Matt is transparent.

Sadly it took whale votes and bought whale votes to get this visibility, so it isn't just noobs it is also others who wish to profit from this.

Noobs by mind. Not by numbers. ;-)

I know enough about internet marketing to know that the ones that are legit have a ton of followers and fans. They also tend to be the ones that offer free value and build trust. When you type Pat Flynn in Google the first suggested auto-fill from google is not "scam". Too bad Matt Trainer can't say the same thing. He's already been arrested for mail fraud in 2001 in St. Louis where investors lost 2.5 million.

I know all about the internet marketing world and I've met plenty of scammers like Matt. You guys are a dime a dozen.

You aren't even good scammers.

It's hilarious! He's like a kid throwing a tantrum. You're out of the club! @mattrainer please ban me too!

I cannot believe Stan is backing this type of person. But then again, geeks are not really good at identifiying conmen........just look at The Dollar and Dan.

Hmmm, maybe. I would like to know @dan thinks about this one.

I'm sorry to say this but Dan is a poor judge of character. people skills and figuring out who is a conman is not in his wheelhouse. this is pretty obvious.

@stellabelle Why do people keep accusing @dan of being a scammer? He's been working in the crypto space for years, he's doing public presentations all the time, would a scammer do that after being caught publicly? I don't get it, got a link with accusations or something? It keeps coming up....

no, Dan is not a scammer. But Dan is a genius type, an inventor. He's good at math and arcane topics. He is not good at judging people. I know this because he told me. I had this problem in the past too, so i know about it. It has to do with trust, and being able to see people with a critical eye. Dan is trustworthy, in my opinion, but I feel that he lacks the necessary social skills to judge people's character. But this is also my opinion. I admire and respect Dan.

You're right, if you have to invest all that time into being a technical genius, there's not much time left for social skills. Only makes sense right ;)

She is not saying that Dan is a scammer, but Dan having a poor judge of character.

I warned him there would be trolls. He's the kind of guy who attacks when attacked. Doesn't prove anything. I'm interested in seeing if it works as a troll containment strategy. Probably not, but as a game master he certainly has the right to keep that kind of stuff from infecting his game.

labeling intelligent people asking intelligent questions as trolls is not accurate.

You do realize that conman who was previously popular in here accounted for scaring off a huge number of users on Steemit, right?

How is he a game master? He mentions nothing of the game. He appears to be trying to sell "how to's" of a game before it exists which doesn't make sense.

He's the kind of guy who attacks when attacked.

Very responsible behavior and instant trust for me to place my money on...

if it works as a troll containment strategy.

You contain trolls by ignoring them. 14 year olds streaming on twitch know how to deal with trolls better than @matttrainer. If he can't handle a few criticising comments on a decentralized platform, good luck on all others.