completely understand where the feeling comes from, however, I think many here feel introductions are valuable for a growing community looking to mature a little and give newcomers a way to participate.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
45 people just voted on what i wrote. If you @myself bothered reading perhaps you wouldn't've brushed it off as simple. Seems democratic participation means jack all to those focused on $
@stino-san, this has little to do with the quality of your post. Actually I quite liked your introduction and I would have upvoted it.
What I wanted to point out, is this dangerous habit of 'me too' voting. I'd like to ask people to upvote a post only when they feel it has not been given enough credit yet. Not because you just like the post.
Act responsibly. We have limited funds to distribute and it's a shame when a good post goes unnoticed while other gets lots of money and attention. Please try to distribute the reward fund as you would if you were spending your own money. So don't upvote a post that already has been well taken care of by someone else before you.
Would you really spend $1.6k of your own money for the pleasure / benefit of reading this stino-san's introduction? I would not.
Thanks for your reply
No he's right. Your sentiment is welcome but general to many in crypto-currency space. Just take it as a complement that you've received so much, because many have written amazing things that are still at 0, or done much, much work for only 100.
Thanks for your introduction and vision for the future.