So basically, you agree with the method of downflagging someone only because you don't like what you see or you don't agree with it? That post you tagged, that was me trying to alert the community of a post that was barely an hour away from cashing out from content that I found on another website which was over a year old. Someone asked the main Poster to show some proof he owned the content found else where too right after the post started becoming popular and he had yet do it. Is this coming from a bad intention here? Or maybe I should have let it go and say fuck it, its just that easy to get away with over 1700 usd? Just like in this one, who are you to tell me that I cant post my own researches to let people know who they are upvoting? Acting almighty as if I have done something wrong here. When I post proof of a known scammer , I get down flagged by the very guy who got the first comment in this post. Once again, is this what flagging should be used for? Censuring people because you don't like what you see?