Interesting. I thought your first question/questions were more a question about how to organize large number people for true democratic change when there is such a decentralized source of information now. In Stockholm alone there are a number of protests everyday, everyone of those drawing a few hundred people. It´s like the opportunity for people to find it´s own information the more un-organized we get? Do you see my point?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I guess that is true, but then perhaps true global change will come from a mass of tiny organisations rather than one big movement? in some ways its stronger because it can't be gotten rid of so easily :-)
Good point. Maybe a range of tiny organisations with one common goal. If that's possible... :)
I think different organisations who have different goals can learn to work together, for example, they may be different in many areas but they have may have some common general aims, they could work together within those to change the issue itself, all too often people get caught up in party politics so won't unite behind a certain issue as they don't want to be seen to stand shoulder to shoulder with people they disagree with on other issues, I guess maybe its ego a lot of the time too, a lot of politicians care more about how they appear, than what they actually do. :-/