I find your blogs stance on global warming to be rather alarming. No scientist I've heard of is asking for a complete reduction of CO2 to 0. Certainly you are aware that respiration rates of plant tissues are often reduced when plants are exposed to, or grown at, high carbon dioxide due to direct effects on enzymes and indirect effects derived from changes in the plant's chemical composition? That c02 is a greenhouse gas capable of trapping thermal radiation within our atmosphere? Whereby an increase in temperature further increases water vaper and the release of methane from permafrost further compounding the issue. That we've raised co2 levels to the point where our oceans are acidifying as they accumulate co2, As algae blooms develop and then die off and sink re-releasing their c02 into deeper levels and creating dead-zones. That the ocean and global temperatures are rapidly changing from the paterns borne out over millenia, that increased temperature has shifted natural air currents which will lead to more unseasonable rains, flooding, and droughts. Colder air blown from glacier meltwater, the disruption of ocean stratum currents and cycling of oxygen. The creation of dustbowls and increase in the rate of forest fires. If you are the one to have written that post, I ask how you've managed to overlook the blatent profiteering activities of the fossil fuel industries and have somehow overlooked that greenland is now a puddle, that ice shelves are crumbling, that temperatures are projected to increase upwards of 10-20 degrees fareignheit without a reduction in c02, that king tides are already inundating coastal areas regularly, that areas which only saw 10 floods a year by rainfall are now getting over 100. Though I do believe it possible we have technological means other than solar and wind and nuclear for clean energy generation the only people I know still supporting fossil fuel consumption are fossil fuel shills and those they've tricked with misleading science campaigns.