I see... don't think I called out that you have no right to use the analogy, more so should you use it. I married into a Jewish family whose grandparents were lucky to have escaped Poland (Ivansk). They lost most family lines but we had an uncle (passed away a couple of years ago) who was a survivor of Auschwitz-Birkenau, Buna, Dora-Mittelbau and Bergen-Belsen death camps. He lived with that tattoo on his arm for the rest of his life. It was a constant reminder to him and all of us.
I don't see much support for using the comparison. Conversely, I do see many organizations and survivors calling for a stop to using it as a comparative. Obviously, you are free to choose to continue to use it.
As a side note, the first law persecuting the Jews was in 1933... would be interesting to see a comparison of the more than 400 decrees and regulations imposed by the Nazi regime on those that had no choice. Then compare them to the current mandates on those that have the freedom to choose.
There is no freedom to choose when massive coercion is involved.
It is quite clear now in Israel that the jab is an utter failure. Rates of serious cases for Omicron are identical irrespective of how many jabs you've had (zero, two, three or even four).
The jab clearly doesn't stop transmission either as its run wild everywhere including places with very high jab rates.
As a side note, German Jews actually did have a choice to give the Nazis half their assets and move to Israel where the value of those assets was a trade credit from the Yishuv to Germany. A huge amount of capital which established the state was transferred this way.
If you went anywhere else the Nazis took all your money,