The probability, if You are working, that Your job is to take money, account for money, pay money, beg for money, aggressively sell for money, advertise/market for money, transport money, lend money, print/mint money, bank money – and other jobs that exist merely to move money – are 80% or more.
Sure, Many do jobs We need for a functional society – farm, design and build places to live, make clothing, ensure transportation is available, and keep Us in communication – but by and large, if the S should HTF, the jobs We do would not be ones We would see.
How many of Us would be suggesting insurance policies as We try to find shelter? Telemarketing as We try to find enough food? Loaning money with usury (or not) as We fight for the scraps We can find?
Not a large number, I would wager.
So, given the foundational function of money, which is to ensure We all are adding Our “fair share” of energy into the system of the day – from trade and barter, through metals and paper, to electronic bits – We can see that most of Us would not be needed to keep the infrastructure going if energy was free.
What becomes a “fair share” of energy to add when all the energy We could use is there for the taking?
Now I have brought up before the very few societies that emerged on Our planet in abundance, where all They needed was there for the taking, and how, in these societies, though they varied in customs and beliefs, there were commonalities in that:
1. There was no poverty
2. The caring Ones took care of things rather than the psychopaths controlling things
3. The People were creative, happy, playful, loving, giving, helpful, caring, sharing
4. The psychopaths amongst Them (1% of Us are psychopaths across the board) learned to choose Their behavior Ethically or be cast out (or killed)
5. There was no money
Today We are doing the needed work for the maintenance of the infrastructure – the food, clothing, shelter, transportation, and communication – with fewer than 20% of Us. And as We add automation to these functions, that percentage drops, and the “displaced” People must find work (a way to add Their energy) moving money somehow.
And We are seeing therefore, more and more of Us slipping into poverty.
Add the fact that energy accounting systems will promote the psychopaths to the top. Any time there are tangible things used to afford living, there is power over Others for Those who have the most. And psychopaths tend to lust after power. And seriously so. And therefore, They will do literally anything They can get away with to acquire the most. Unlike most of Us, They do not draw lines at defrauding, stealing, sabotaging, torturing, or murdering.
And over time, the tokens used to account for Our energy added will accumulate into Their coffers. And then, They have power over the rest. They can buy the People They need to do any ghastly thing They want to. Like all the medical industry to pull off a plannedemic. As just one of a nigh infinite things They have the power to do because They have the money.
So if 80% and more of Us are not needed to keep things functioning beyond the moneyed structure – what would happen if free energy flowed and We no longer needed to make sure We all were adding Our fair share?
I have had People suggest that WALL-E, a film suggesting We would all just get fat and lazy if robots and other automation took over all the work, shows what would happen. But that assumes that no One has the option of doing things. If energy was flowing freely, and We had no need to account for it, and all needed things were provided – either by automation or by People who love to do the work – the creations and explorations would burgeon.
The arts and the sciences would blossom.
There would be no motive to produce “food” devoid of nutrients, to poison the water, spew toxins in the air, go to war, sell drugs that sicken so as to have more profit, lie about history, control and diminish education, propagandize, hide beneficial tech, and all the other things We see the psychopaths doing to Humanity today, because They have the money and therefore can.
If money was removed and We were all living richly, sovereign and Ethical, there would be plenty of Us who love to heal Others, teach Others, create Ethical solutions to problems. We would not need to appoint Some to solve all problems. The Ones who are affected, who care, can ethically solve for any problem the best way – not the cheapest/most profitable, or left to fester because there is no money…
A solutocracy. See link below.
If money were removed, We all could live as We choose. If We want to live in a cave as a hermit – We can. If We want to live like the Amish, We can. If We want to have the burden of a castle to live in, We can – but it will be no status symbol...
I see a solution that ends with Humanity on Our planet all being able to live as We choose, alone or in communities based on family, religion, interests, and/or goals, with the agreement that We all choose Our behavior Ethically – We choose Our behavior within the three Laws of Ethics.
Where no One needs to figure out if They can afford something because all needs are richly met and all Ethical desires are likely to be filled to a probability of 97%.
And I can't see anyOne complaining about being able to live like that.
We don’t need to make People work – We have plenty who would love to do the creative work needed to support the whole, will solve problems that affect Them, and machines to do the rest. We can follow Our bliss, fulfill Our potential, make Our dreams come true.
As My regular readers know, I ask for no money as payment for My work for Humanity. I ask for payment in shares. Please, if You feel My work has value, share with ten or more People. This will be the only way the information is spread.
Links to My work for Humanity:
Solutocracy – A Way to Govern (article): https://peakd.com/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/solutocracy-a-way-to-govern
Greed is a Symptom of Energy Accounting (article): https://peakd.com/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/greed-is-a-symptom-of-energy-accounting
Accounting For the Energy We Add (article): https://peakd.com/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/accounting-for-the-energy-we-add
Quantifying Wealth (article): https://peakd.com/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/quantifying-wealth
The Whole Package! – The Abundance Paradigm novella chapter links! (article): https://peakd.com/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/the-whole-package
They Really ARE 1984ing Us (article): https://peakd.com/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/they-really-are-1984ing-us
Signature:
Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/260/endia
Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/72/quite-opposite-short-story-change
The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/242/abundance-paradigm-novella
My father taught Me never to believe anything. He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data. He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on Odysee or YouToilet). From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw. So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.
I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles. I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics. I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"
When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY. Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.
From this I realized the WHY. We were accounting for Our energy input into things. And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).
I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...
I was very interested in psychology, too. And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths. Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene. Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.
And I asked... If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them? I think You can figure out what answer I came up with. And would that explain what I see? Absolutely.
Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy. If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy?
And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.
So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather... I am a conspiracy analyst. And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound. That explains perfectly what I see.
Love always.