Or even potentially verifiable some difficult scientific hypotheses whose verification is postponed due to a lack of facts of tools by means of which we can put an experiment and so on to the scientific common sense of the word but is not so disagreeable with another theory of logical positivism. If we weaken the criteria in the building science building will start a photo of a different metaphysical example of a God whose existence check can be considered so far postponed we can not put a crucial experiment on Therefore, in this regard, just logical positivism suffered its main craft. By the age of 40, and even one more dramatic story was connected with a car that was not a philosopher, but there was logic, and by the way in Koenigsberg for the first time in the year 30, long before the forties presented sketches which is some short time formed a proof of the theorem on the incompleteness of non-conviction which proved logical rigor roughly the following, then every strict formal system is based on letting it on some Meta principles which within the framework of this system are not formalizable inexplicable and should be allowed to rise upwards ie is metaphysical. If we want somehow postulates, I think we need to build a method for them to rise to a new level and so on indefinitely that is, the entire building of science rests on what something metaphysical in the static from the necessary physics Minister Absolutely true logical positivists must be given to them should have been people followers intellectually honest and they recognized the difficulties they encountered in the program mmu Well, they also had a song smoothly moving to the theme of postpositivism. It is absolutely true first of all Karl Popper Karl Popper is the younger a little younger associate Oleg the logical positivists from Vienna to the circle is not