DAOSTACK Project in Detailed

DAO is the agencies that are operating with some smart contracts on the blockchain. It complies with the demonstrable rules and it can never be broken but changeable according to the rules. It can or cannot be self-contained depending on the preferred governance system. It deals with a single point to control or failure into the organization.
It synchronizes with the agents to identify the biology as stigmergy activated by the encouragement of a code. Therefore, DAO is organizing the entity for a larger and better resembles for the organism rather than the organization. Into the processing of activation of control, some of the data get missing and those missing files are the DAOstack. Being an operating system for a collective engine, it acts as a toolkit for exponential organizations.

Holographic Consensus

All the problems can be identified as an under-appreciated proposal and it enables to place 100 GEN stake during the prediction and this will pass through the attainment of the collective attention. The opposite of it can also happen just like staking 200GEN by the prediction of some certain proposals from getting over-hyped because it will never pass this from being boosted as considered tightly.
The perfect predictors are able to make some profits whereas the incorrect ones lose their stakes. It plays the production game to the predictors contributing the governance process that will be signaling to and will make filters for the maintenance of the governance process.

Relative Majority

It has a straight-forward form of the scalable decision-making process. It has demands on the relative majority to approve the decision. The majority of relativity will mean the majority of approvals through the respect for those who cast their vote and all the potential voters into the system.

The issue with Relative Majority

The relative majority votes require consideration for a finite time for the window proposals. It solves some issues related to this. The previous systems of governance will introduce with the quorum. The minimal amount o voting power will be required for engaging in the decision for making a legitimate approval. Sometimes it seems impossible to solve the problem with a quorum to fix with the right amount of it.
If the problem cannot be solved, then it will either damage it at the lower resilience, or the scalability will be settled higher. In some critical point, both can be done together. If it is found that almost all the quorum is required to be dynamic then it will need to describe the resilient governance protocol through the next. Without the quorum, it will create the quorum based on the relative majority of monetization of attention.

Compositionality

The governance system considers two different cases. The first one has nine agents of a company with an equal number of votes and to the next one; it consists of the agents of a company that equals with the votes. It is composed of three agents with equal votes. The sub companies are casting these votes into the mother company sooner bit develops the decision by means of the support for the internal majority. For the first case, it needs attention and consensus of five human agents. This will cast a decision in support of the mother company.
On the other hand, it will be sufficient to get a consensus of four human agents into the second scenarios to make a decision I favor of the mother company. It can be emphasized with a simple illustration of an example for the fact of the compositionality or fractalization of the governance systems by means of making the system more scalable. It has compromised resilience that has been taken over the system by a lesser number of human agents. It was observed that none of the configurations of these four human agents follows the second scenario in terms of generating decisions for the mother company. The deeper the scrutiny can be shown for the different assumption, the resilient the second case can become weaker or stronger.