So far, I have discovered nothing other than he doesn't spend a lot of time with every single ICO he advises. He's made it into a business. He has put money and resources into this business. He's doing alright if you ask me. There are just too many pieces of indisputable evidence supporting the fact that he is not running a dog and pony show. LDJ is real. His appearances in the mainstream media and his celebrity connections on video are not fabricated. This whole thing sounds like a simple case of "Hateritus". Curable with a few doses of "actrite". What is everyone expecting from him? To take over the show and singlehandedly bring success to every project? Imagine wearing the same shoes for a day. Imagine a bunch of whiny, over expecting CEOs that think they have you at their beck and call. Then when shit goes south on them and their project fails, they do what many humans in the same position do. They place blame. Of course, they will blame the person that they thought was their ticket to easy street and instant success. I have brought this directly to his attention and I was not met with a defensive response, just an explanation and then on to the next order of business. Remember that there are several sides to every story. Sometimes the loudest ones, have the least value to add to it. I can't say that I'm overly enthusiastic about this advisory but he has done more than a few others we almost brought into the project. Also, we made it clear from the very beginning that we are hiring contributing board members only. We are not paying for pretty faces and ICO success scores. Thank you for the topic. At the very least this allowed me to reasses the way I assess situations.