I'm transcribing these AMA sessions from HLI on 4chan.
This is not because I'm necessarily subscribing to every word or believing it without question, but it was more compelling than any AMA I've seen in a long time. It takes a long time to read them on 4chan so I thought this might be quicker for busy people to get at the content.
He says some pretty heavy shit along the ride. Obama = Osama, Clinton blackmail/pedo/cocaine dealing/9-11, he even says Hillary's campaign logo is symbolic of her pride behind closed doors over 9/11.
He wholly ignores the maelstrom of racist shitposters on 4chan - but if one of them does have an intelligent question underneath the epithets, he will skip over the offensive language and answer the question.
He starts later posts with mysterious photos - for example, the spooky Bank of America mural in Charlotte, NC and Plato's Allegory of the Cave, plus many more. I'm including those in the transcripts. He refers to his organization as Three and is completely non-racist on all fronts (unlike FBIanon). It's compelling stuff when you dig through it. I wanted to see if anyone is as fascinated as I am.
I'll stop cutting and pasting the above after a few more threads.
This is when he started beginning each thread with an image.
HLI:
High level insider here.
Question session open for a while.
--gif titled OurEnterprise.gif--
/pol/: All right. I'll bite.
What the hell is going to happen in Vermont?
HLI: A distraction
/pol/: How long until allout civil war and martial law?
HLI: To the extent that your hypothesis is reasonable, it already exists.
In the sense of mad max in real life, never.
/pol/: All right. How's Hillary's MS?
HLI: The health of the president isn't particularly important except that they need to be able to read a teleprompter in a controlled environment.
It is a largely ceremonial role.
/pol/: Will Huma be running this shit, then?
HLI: Huma is not a decision maker.
/pol/: What is their plan to stop Trump?
HLI: Trump never intended to be the nominee, much less president.
The public's willingness to believe in the legitimacy of a Clinton victory will be gauged shortly before the election. If it is plausible, Trump will torpedo himself and Hillary will be put in place.
If the public turns too strongly against her, Trump will be given the nod and the economy will be put into major recession to discourage any hint of nationalism in candidates that come after him.
/pol/: What is the absolute, pants-shittingest worst-case scenario for the elites right now?
HLI: Someone that cannot be killed or coerced that is intelligent enough to propose another way.
/pol/: You will not break our love for our country with money. Bankers have necks and are capable of being hanged. You push the plebs too hard and we will simply eliminate you. You'll be rich in your coffin.
HLI: We are not interested in breaking you. You are breaking yourself.
/pol/: So if trump flat-out wins, they won't just use rigged voting software?
HLI: From our perspective, there is little meaningful difference between Hillary and Donald.
/pol/: What the fuck is your plan to deal with Russia?
HLI: Russia has significant institutional inertia, but lacks robust harnessing of talent or the ability to recruit it. We would like to see that improve.
/pol/: Interesting.
Straight-up: Is this a sino-russian coup?
Also, for how many more years do you think the second amendment will exist?
HLI: There is a weakly emergent Sino-Russian block, but it lacks any hegemonic initiative or sufficient agreement to be a proactive rather than reactive force in the world, for now.
The second amendment is not a major concern. What good has it done you so far?
/pol/: All right. Assange. How much does he actually have, and does he want to barter for his freedom or actually affect things?
Also, what's endgame for you guys? And does it have anything to do with the NAU?
HLI: Assange doesn't have an endgame but does have a potent blackmail file. The result is that he will persist, but more often than not be used as a tool rather than intentionally shaping events himself.
As to the NAU, we don't care about "one world government" so to speak. Multiple governments that can be controlled or one government that can be controlled is functionally equivalent as far as we are concerned.
/pol/: All right. Two more questions for ya, then.
Who's going to be left, and what merits do they have? If that's not even a relevant question, then who will be the wheat and who will be the chaff?
The frescoe in Bank of America and the mural in Denver International Airport. Is there similar artwork anywhere, and if so, where?
HLI: We have no interest in depopulation schemes or the like.
It's true that some elements of some governments entertain these ideas, but they strongly prefer growing population and more worker bees subject to their ability to manage it.
The paintings at BoA are more telling than Denver.
/pol/: Wait, make it three.
Cigarettes. These things are on-purpose, right? And they're totally radioactive?
HLI: Depends on what you mean on purpose.
No one created a tobacco industry to secretly depopulate you. People have promoted it because exploitation of physical addiction is profitable.
/pol/: At what point can you guys declare “checkmate?"
Why do you think that what you're doing is the right thing to do?
What's your connection to academic institutions?
Are there any left that actually teach the things you would want yourself or your own children taught?
HLI: It's hard to see such an eventuality at this point.
This is a bit broad for me to answer succinctly. Try narrowing your question.
We are similar to an academic institution, but free of public corruption.
The most interesting thing you will learn about in school is the way other people think. For education beyond this, it is not the place to be.
/pol/: Yes you are. You want to alter our governments and laws in order to benefit yourselves. The world was not made for you and only you. You will be reminded of that through polite conversation or at the point of a gun. Pick.
HLI: We do not believe in Pareto philosophy.
/pol/: All right, then. What do you stand for? No, that's too vague. Why do you guys think all this secrecy and manipulation is justified? What virtue do you uphold?
I take it all with a grain of salt, but I'm open to any possibility in a world of lies.
HLI: You've partially answered this on your own. Look at the quality of your educational institutions.
If you think the world is a dark place now, imagine if that was the best we actually have.
/pol/: Funny how the results of your manipulation have those kinds of results. You hold too much influence over the structure and function of our society. You will ease off or you will be eased off. The choice is yours.
HLI: It is our sincere wish that your impotent rage becomes potent action.
/pol/: All right. Actual last question before I rest.
How do I inquire about you guys IRL?
HLI: There are of course secret communication protocols in use among us in public and things of this nature.
While it may seem unsatisfactory, we find each other as you become ready. No man is an island unto himself and all plausible growth trajectories of your person involve eventual interaction with those who are leading the way ahead of you.
/pol/: I'll bet. You guys want to kill us off and the current rules favor you and your security at our expense. For lots of us, this will be the final political effort we will make. If that is unsuccessful, you would do well to flee from this place.
HLI: You pose no threat to us.
If we can make rules, why can't you?
Once you can make rules, you've become one of us.
/pol/: I'm powerless because I am powerless
Keep thinking that. We all bleed. We can't make the rules because you bully the stage on which the rules are made.
HLI: What will become of the world without such esteemed intellectual thought controlling our future?
/pol/: what happens in martial law?
i see here it says "military government, involving the suspension of ordinary law."
what does that imply? how do things work?
HLI: Fantastical delusions of the questionably sane.
--end--
Interesting read, hard to say that this HLI is not just some internet troll however.
I know. That's everyone's first response. I almost wrote it off but then just committed to reading every single post.... it goes on through November 2016. And I was really impressed. Whatever he is.... it's fascinating.