Over the weekend the CDC told some truth. Only 6% of deaths are from the exosome alone. Based on the current 165,000 death count this would be 9900 dead. Still wonder why we never hear abou recovery rates or death rates? Still covering your face and breathing your own excrement? Can't read the fine print that removes your favorite corporation from liability? Here are some links and videos to help.
Ron Paul talking about the CDC announcement
90%+ FALSE POSITIVES FROM A NON QUALITATIVE METHOD. The food shortage is closer now.
Amazing how the world fell for this total BS! I said the same thing and im pretty sure this so called pandemic could be given to flu or anything else and it would have had a bigger death toll
I’m hearing now they already preparing the second wave of bullshit with a so called mutated strain lol it’s laughable at this point if it wasn’t so devastatingly sad for the average persons life
Not at all the world has fell for this many times. If you have the courage watch the video. If you are capable of critical thinking you can most likely learn the pattern. If you actually thinks it's BS, consider how to defeat it.
Cheers
@darkflame @deuceman
Nothing new here. This is a tried and true method that has been used many times.
Hegelian Dialectic. Problem Reaction Solution.
As many times as has been perpetrated there are still willful idiots. Examples easily found on this post.
LoL Youtube took that vid down. You should try brighteon or somewhere else.
Good post
well thank you. I try to keep my posts simple and informative.
Someone at zerohedge finally picked up this news. https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/ron-paul-cdc-bombshell-only-6-covid-deaths-only-covid
Congratulations @nutritree! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPDo not miss the last post from @hivebuzz:
Do the trolls believe the Jew York Times? https://needtoknow.news/2020/09/yikes-new-york-times-estimates-90-of-positive-covid-test-results-really-are-negative/
@rawbe did you see this?
Interesting fact
But wait. There is more!
Here is late reporting from the epoch limes. https://link.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/94-percent-of-covid-19-deaths-in-us-have-other-contributing-health-conditions-cdc-says_3484659.html
That's nice and all, until you realise that 60% of adults in the USA have at least one chronic condition, which rises to 78% for those over the age of 55. The CDC restated the obvious, people with chronic conditions are far more likely to die than those without, but that point is next to moot if only 40% of the adult population doesn't any chronic conditions.
If you shoot someone with hemophilia in the foot and they bleed out to death, you aren't going to be able to convince anyone reasonable that you didn't kill them.
If you have a chronic condition and you get sick, your body has to even more to deal with and you're more likely to die of the sickness, you can't just blame the chronic condition and you especially can't just blame the chronic condition if they were living well prior to getting sick.
Viruses give zeros shits about politics, economies, or anything else.
Let's assume that the 40% without chronic conditions have no chance of dying, what would the numbers look like?
Given that 60% of adults in the USA have at least one chronic condition, and that the current COVID-19 death rate is 5% in the USA, we can calculate that if everyone with a chronic condition got COVID-19, 3% of the US population would die.
If you kill off 3% of the US population you're still going to have a massive economic downturn, that's nearly 10 million people.
The real problem here is the government in the USA is incompetent as fuck and didn't follow the lead of countries like Norway, Finland, and New Zealand, who all took precautions to make sure people wouldn't lose their jobs and that businesses were as protected as they could be. The USA's government didn't even follow their own damn plan which was made in advance just in case a pandemic occurred, as it's good practice to keep plans ready in case shit hits the fan.
What about Switzerland? Sure if you get sick then you have a worse time. What led someone to get sick in the first place? Most disease is degenerative. Degeneration is a cumulative and continuous process that is reversible through lifestyle. You can throw out all of the rational response you want to defend the stupidity of the world including your lists. Politicians are not as dumb as you think they are. They are very cold and calculated.
The response to this failure of a bioweapon is certainly political. People can gather in the street to loot and burn, but now even a court will permit a church without draconian restriction.
CDC was denied a patent twice and then outsources illegal research when the NIH wizened. Then the predictors predicted before the first cold outbreak. Yes even the cold will kill people with co morbidities.
I love the facts that numbers for other exosomal responses are significantly reduced. Yes exosomes are emitted from cells as a response to environmental factors including stress.
Why are so many successful therapies suppressed? Even billionaires are unable to escape the coincidence theories.
People that look for reasons to support official data sets have to overlook the fact that everyone, especially the powerful lie.
Now that the cat is out of the proverbial bag only cases matter to the lame stream. 90%+ false possitives will really inflate the numbers.
Switzerland's rate of chronic disease is also quite high, around 5/6th that of the US, or about 50% of adults. I don't see that number fluctuating too much between countries unless they're not collecting info and/or lying about their numbers. Humans are prone to developing lots of issues, what matters more is how well we can treat issues so that they don't effect people's lives in normal circumstances.
Switzerland's success dealing with COVID-19 is likely down to a combination of swift response and geography. They banned mass gatherings the day after their first confirmed case and quickly distributed fliers and information regarding safe hygiene practices. Initially, in late February, they banned gatherings of 1000 or more people, but brought it down to 100 or more people by the second week of March. With one canton going further and having a cap of only 50. In addition, all educational establishments were closed alongside the lower cap. A few days after this they closed all services deemed non-essential, and issued a relief package to cover most wages and business expenses. A few more days later they reduced the gathering cap down to 5 people.
These measures lead to an immediate and sharp decline in new cases, and by late April, they began to slowly ease restrictions. They started by allowing businesses where people didn't gather in mass to open, such as hair dressers. On top of that they also allowed some non-essential shops to open as well. Both types of businesses had to follow safety procedures. By the end of the second week of May, they began to open the rest of the shops as well as primary and secondary education schooling. Then by the start of the second week of June, they started opening higher education and other public services. Mass gatherings over 1000 people are still prohibited until at least October 1st.
In the USA and many other countries, politicians focus primarily on profiting and staying in power. This means they they're going to be very good at some things, but in no way makes them smart. They're just as vulnerable to manipulation and misinformation as anyone else is when it comes to topics they're not familiar with. Additionally, due to their primary interests, they will often avoid decisions that would cause short term loss, even if the long term gain massively outweighs that loss.
Regarding suppression of successful therapies, I haven't seen much info regarding that. There could be any number of reasons any one treatment is dismissed, such as having an unacceptable risk of complications.
From what I've seen, the actual false positive rate is lower than 5%. Not sure where you get this "90%" from. If you're referring to testing sensitivity in the USA, that particular test has an even lower false positive rate. A positive with that test guarantees the sample was infected with COVID, but it does not guarantee a patient is contagious. A test is only false positive if it returns positive but the patient is not infected at all, such as if the sample is contaminated after collection but before testing.
You could also be referring to a defective batch of tests in Connecticut, which led to 90 people receiving false-positive tests. Either way, the number of false positives is not high enough to be a concern.
If anything, higher sensitivity will make the US look better because it will make death rates look lower than elsewhere as it'll be including infections that didn't pose much risk to begin with.
The inventor of the polymorase chain reaction said it was never intended for qualitative analysis. Jew York Times: Should your test be negative?. Chinese studies have been reported at 80% false positive rates. No one ever offers a tcell immunity test. I hope you step out onto thehighwire with del bigtree. There are better people with numbers than me that would certainly do a better job of breaking down the death rate than I can.
This action is not available to me. I have terminated all relationships with twittler. You should check out http://parler.com
I heard this report and people have been willfully exploiting it uneccessarily. I think it is music 🎶 for truthters and conspiracy theorists because they love misinformation.
The data actually says 6% of deaths were caused by COVID-19 alone (people with no health issues). The other 94% of people had pre-existing conditions (diabetes, hypertension,..) that the covid virus made worse and led to death. So in all of the more than 184K deaths we have, the covid virus played a role. People with pre-existing conditions got a bad break!
Ok reality theorist. What about this data? https://newstarget.com/2020-09-02-hydroxychloroquine-covid-19-73-percent-lower-fatality-rate.html
What is your justification to locking down entire economies. How many suicides have happened this year? Do you know how to form a question or just regurgitate a narrative?
What is an exosome? Was COVID-1984 the result of outlawed gain of function research? Who is Judy Mikovitz?
I read a hit piece about this from my local paper. They said that 94% of people died of COVID1984 with underlying conditions. So these underlying conditions just so happen to take a very long time to degrade your body over time. Then you get a cold and die so we blame the cold? Nice logic there reality theorist.