You know, although I won't vote this as it's mostly AI, it does have value. This is where I think AI has a use - it can objectively summarize the situation and removes drama (provided we prompt it to consider both sides). The problem with Hive is that we all get emotional about things.
It's pretty clear really that receipts should be provided. Hive touts itself about being transparent. Yes, it is arduous for guiltyparties to do so, but anyone dealing with funding outside the chain would have to do the same thing in the public interest.
Author Rewards are set to commentrewarder at 100%,this will reward the commentators I vote for using author rewards for this post. I understand not voting for it.
HI wanted an opinion from something incapable of emotion and to view this without bias. What better than s third party source not involved in hive affairs.
Emotions is a great tool to give social communication some spice. However detrimental when trying to solve an issue so I agree with you there.
Showing proof of sales is not even an issue. Especially when it comes to using community funds. Their argument that large stakeholders hold the higher loss and I find that to be not true. They get to choose who receives the hives community gathered funds because they hold higher stake weight, but if they are syphoning money away from the dhf for kickbacks that is an major issue for us all not just 3 or 4 high profile accounts.
3 or 4 people regardless for their stake weight don't speak for the whole community, but time will tell what will happen.