I already have 8 followers on my trail.
I am giving my downvote to @darkflame who is admin of @hivecoffee.
Also @broncnutz because he is downvoting a left wing shill both of us despise who has a unhealthy obsession with anti Trump tabloid grade shit posts. Its rare I will go after Trump Derangement Syndrome but this media outlet is just trash in general imo even when he is focused on his left wing elitism that is causing cancel culture to take root everywhere online.
Does this mean anyone I downvote, you also will downvote? I find the discussion very interesting but am still understanding the mechanics of the downvote. There are certain types of content that should be downvoted, but I have actually been enjoying some quality content lately. I could start downvoting if I find content that is problematic, but I don't really want to start downvoting content that I just don't like, as some do. I think could be useful with correcting abusive actions, if users are exploiting the reward pool or not delivering any Proof-of-Brain value.
The proof of brain value would come from lowering the inflation of the rewards pool.
This concept would be going towards 100% Community consensus or the post would be censored from the front end, I'm sure there's a way to scale some sort of interoperability into a downvote trail that would enable small users to effectively flag spam without requiring a service like @hivewatchers
I'm not really down with content moderation through flagging.
Being pro free speech means changing the channel.
I have been following your trail with one of my alts.
I knew you were downvoting that guy, but didn't care enough to speak up for him.
They tell me that is wrong, I shouldn't be like that, but there it is.
My buddy watches that guy regularly, one day we were watching it and that dude said he would allow a lie to stand if that lie served his cause.
My buddy couldn't see why that was wrong.
He's a yankee, so what do you do?
'It is the duty of the intellectual to tell the truth, and expose lies.' Bill Hicks
But that guy uses the Alinsky method, and I'm not down with 'by any means necessary'.