Without a doubt, the high votes, rewards for healing, routes of healing, and now this new position of rejecting votes, confirm the context in which Greek philosopher Heraclitus expressed that "The dialectic is full of contradictions", this delivery of @themarkymark clears up the unknown of why my articles do not receive the support of appreciator, I intuited that it was because my blog is exclusively about STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics), and maybe it doesn't meet their criteria for healing that until today I considered to be a valid approach, because every user, be it a fish or a whale, is free to support whatever they want, but now I understand what the real reason is, and that is simply that the scientific value of the publications is not among their main guidelines for healing and they simply discard to vote for users who have already received some votes of modest value. Even though, I often receive support from @themarkymark, who I think is passionate about scientific academic content, that shouldn't mean a problem or arms war between high HP accounts, so I think, we should evolve as a community.