You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: SPinvest's Largest HP Delegation: Time for a Change?

in #hive20 days ago

Sad to see you spreading misinformation.

This is completely inaccurate and you said in your own post you’re unwilling to pull proof of it?

We make remediated payments to any missed delegation payouts. Saying that you subjectively believe this to be inaccurate, accusing us of not paying and then saying you also are unwilling to provide proof is harmful to the project and baseless without actual data.

Would recommend editing this post to say it’s your opinion and not data-backed fact.

Also you should watch announcements more closely, we talked about this issue at length and also sent multiple double payments + our normal remediated payments.

Feel free to pull if you find this in accurate, but I won’t allow people to post nonsensical misinformation that isn’t grounded in any fact without correcting them as I am doing here.

Sort:  

You're not correcting me. You are trying to say im wrong by saying you started remediated payments a few weeks ago. This was after leo.voter only paid out 9 days in a month. What about before this?

image.png

Show me the data of all back payments for the months of missed payments before you started remediated payments a few weeks ago.

😂

Who said we started remediated payments a few weeks ago?

The day after a payment is missed, the remediated payments start.

Also, what you're showing above is not an accurate representation of dates. You're using the approximated dates on a hive block explorer

To accurately show dates, I recommend using a spreadsheet and showing actual xx/xx/xxxx dates

As I said, I pull this data regularly and handle remediated payments myself. When people make accusations and have no data to actually back it up, I have a problem with that. Some people read blog posts like this one and believe what you're saying is accurate despite the lack of data.

I track what things yield over time, not on a daily basis. Im seeing that it's not yielding 12% for us over the course of 3,6 or 12 months. This could be many reasons for this.

I'll remove that line you highlighted.

oh if you track it then we should have no problem

Can you show me your tracking that indicates you’re not earning 12%?

Actual data + dates and calculations

Like I said in DM, thanks for helping me make my mind up.

You've handled this well

Enjoy the rest of your day

I approach things from a data driven mindset and everyone knows that I have an open door policy for feedback

When feedback is given, I listen. I definitely prefer it to be constructive feedback that is backed by reality but still listen even if that is not the case. I will publicly correct if I see accusations that are contrary to data

Making your mind up either way is a good approach and I hope that clarity has been given here as opposed to subjective opinion. Have a good one