DHF: Decentralized Hive Fund or Decentralized Hive Flop?
Alright, Hive, let’s cut the niceties. I recently faced a downvote on my content—because gasp I dared to use AI tools. Seriously? This is 2025, not the dark ages. If I want to use every tool at my disposal to create, innovate, or simply write a freaking post, why is that a problem?

The DHF exists to fund innovation, right? To push Hive forward, not pull it back. But here we are, where decisions feel like they’re based on personal grudges and outdated thinking. Here’s the kicker: this time, I didn’t even use AI. It was a good old-fashioned copy-paste. So what’s the real problem—AI, or people looking for excuses to gatekeep creativity?

Let’s be real:

If Hive wants to grow, it needs to embrace innovation, not stifle it.
If DHF is going to act like judge, jury, and executioner, at least explain your decisions. Accountability, anyone?
And if using tools like AI is a problem, maybe we need a reality check. The rest of the world isn’t stopping for Hive to play catch-up.
So here’s my message: let’s stop pretending like this is about "originality" or "quality" and admit it’s about control. Hive can’t thrive if it keeps alienating creators and innovators.

Feel free to downvote this too—I’m not here to play nice. I’m here to point out what’s broken and ask why we’re not fixing it.