You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: @Reward.app - liquid payouts for author + liquid curation rewards :)

in #hive4 years ago

I think I get the general idea behind, but it made me wonder, how hard it is going to be to code a bot that will spot those posts with the beneficiaries set and vote only those posts for the max profit?

Remember that author can set the additional curators share to 0% :)

Continuing that line of thought.. it will open a new opportunity to those spammy and abusive accounts to get automated votes, just because the beneficiary is set.

We can downvote those too.

Why not extending the 5 min window?

Well, the 5 min windows doesn't mean that you should vote in those 5 minutes- quite the opposite. And yes, this will work like you mentioned, it's gonna be still worth to vote for old posts / posts that already get good reward. At least more than now.

Sort:  

Remember that author can set the additional curators share to 0% :)

They can. But lots will set higher too I bet, so averagely it will still be better than voting the old fashioned posts?

the 5 min windows doesn't mean that you should vote in those 5 minutes- quite the opposite.

The problem is that a lot of people do vote in the 5 min. Also very big accounts vote in that time. So if I vote later, my curation rewards are going down and down... So I don't have to, but I kind of have to :)